Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2022, 10:47 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The actual point is that from the second enchanters get charm it is powerful and can be used/abused regularly to result in far more effective solo capability than a warrior can expect. Done properly there is basically no down time and will result in significantly more kills over time than the best of twinked out warriors.

My warrior had 34% haste, fungi and comparable weapons. Could I solo like a buzz saw for the early levels? Absolutely but there was still down time. At best I might have been able to break even with a charm pet fighting monsters of comparable level. Fighting mobs close to the level of the charm pet? No way.

This side tangent is absolutely idiotic.
Nobody argued that point that Enchanter charm gets more powerful hehe. I was simply countering the point that classes like Shamans are dead weight in lower levels. This is true, Shamans suck from levels 1-30, but the point is classes like Enchanters and Clerics really aren't much better. They also need about 30 levels to really get going. So it isn't a good argument to say "don't take a Shaman, because they are dead weight at low levels". That is true for other classes too, and you would want to take them since they scale great later on.

Again, Enchanters at low levels have a lot of downtime too. You are vastly underestimating low meditate values, resists, fizzles, interrupts, etc. at low levels. I am leveling an Enchanter, I know hehe.

My Warrior just has SCHW, Wurmslayer, and Fist of Zek.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-31-2022 at 10:50 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2022, 10:51 AM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nobody argued that point that Enchanter charm gets more powerful hehe. I was simply countering the point that classes like Shamans are dead weight in lower levels. This is true, Shamans suck from levels 1-30, but the point is classes like Enchanters and Clerics really aren't much better. They also need about 30 levels to really get going. So it isn't a good argument to say "don't take a Shaman, because they are dead weight at low levels". That is true for other classes too, and you would want to take them since they scale great later on.
You're just straight up wrong. As I mentioned before I duo'd enc/enc from 1-55. Me and my buddy were duoing camps and killing faster more efficiently in our teens than entire groups. Enchanters are broken powerful. Even if your stupid warrior can do comparable damage (debatable) it can't sustain it as long as a well played enchanter can. I can't believe you're honestly trying to argue this shit. It's fucking absurd.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.