Physiognomy

[Bardalicious]

Originally Posted by deakolt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pretty sure it was luclin. I assume the developers haven't made this change because it's something they'd have to screw with in the client?

I would almost have to assume it can be disabled by the server similar to how they can disable the use of the cartography system and the dye system. It cannot be entirely client-side else nobody else would see the changed face. At some point the client has to tell the server which face is being picked and the server sets it in the character database.

Is it possible to stop that from happening? Sure. Is it worth spending time on when there are almost always more important things that need fixing? Not imo.

[deakolt]

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would almost have to assume it can be disabled by the server similar to how they can disable the use of the cartography system and the dye system. It cannot be entirely client-side else nobody else would see the changed face. At some point the client has to tell the server which face is being picked and the server sets it in the character database.

Is it possible to stop that from happening? Sure. Is it worth spending time on when there are almost always more important things that need fixing? Not imo.

you're probably right now that I think about it. if anything the devs could just trap all incoming face change requests and ignore them

[Slave]

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is it possible to stop that from happening? Sure. Is it worth spending time on when there are almost always more important things that need fixing? Not imo.

Let's not downplay the importance of immersion in a video game. This is what Everquest was always the best at.