Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2022, 01:51 PM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hard to force anything on a baby who is killed before being born. I care more about the innocent unborn than I do some lazy slob who got pregnant and doesn’t want to take responsibility(90% of abortions are done for convenience).

I can love someone and also not support their choice to ruin their life.
Ignorant zealot. You would rather roll the dice to see if a raped young girl can birth a child than abort the fetus.

Treatment for a septic uterus is an abortion

Treatment for an ectopic pregnancy is an abortion

Treatment for a miscarriage that your body won’t release is an abortion.

Stupid Bible thumpers have no place in policing others bodies to their standards of belief.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2022, 02:06 PM
Ooloo Ooloo is offline
Planar Protector

Ooloo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 2,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ignorant zealot. You would rather roll the dice to see if a raped young girl can birth a child than abort the fetus.

Treatment for a septic uterus is an abortion

Treatment for an ectopic pregnancy is an abortion

Treatment for a miscarriage that your body won’t release is an abortion.

Stupid Bible thumpers have no place in policing others bodies to their standards of belief.
Haha, this is absolutely NOT true. None of those things are considered an abortion, and there is zero legislation in any state preventing medical treatment of those conditions. This is just another absolutely terrible red herring argument to distract from the fact that 99% of the time an abortion is just a perfectly healthy baby being chopped into pieces and thrown in the garbage. I know it's very unpleasant to think about that fact; why do you think that is?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2022, 02:54 PM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,877
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Haha, this is absolutely NOT true. None of those things are considered an abortion, and there is zero legislation in any state preventing medical treatment of those conditions. This is just another absolutely terrible red herring argument to distract from the fact that 99% of the time an abortion is just a perfectly healthy baby being chopped into pieces and thrown in the garbage. I know it's very unpleasant to think about that fact; why do you think that is?
And here in lies why idiot right voters who listen to Ben Shapiro actually don’t use facts.

An abortion is made up to be your definition. You call it some medical procedure when your own party still argues it shouldn’t be preform. Morons.

Abortion to you doesn’t mean an induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.

Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2022, 03:22 PM
Ooloo Ooloo is offline
Planar Protector

Ooloo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 2,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And here in lies why idiot right voters who listen to Ben Shapiro actually don’t use facts.

An abortion is made up to be your definition. You call it some medical procedure when your own party still argues it shouldn’t be preform. Morons.

Abortion to you doesn’t mean an induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.

Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
All of the conditions you listed are potentially fatal to the life of the mother and involve a fetus that is either already dead or one that cannot possibly survive naturally. They by definition are not abortions, and I'm not aware of any legislation even in the reddest of states that would prevent treating those conditions. If there is, then I oppose those specific pieces of legislation obviously. See how you can have a nuanced position and not just rabidly adhere to one side or the other? You have absolutely no point, I'm sorry, and it's still just a red herring. I'm an atheist so this is not religiously based in any way.

Thanks for the middleschool level insults though, really helps your position that killing perfectly healthy babies and throwing their dismembered bodies in the garbage is cool and good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2022, 03:26 PM
robayon robayon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: GA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
middleschool level insults... throwing their dismembered bodies in the garbage is cool and good.
I am officially calling this Oolooation. Oolooation is where you do the very thing you're criticizing in the post where you criticize the thing. Required intelligence score of 3, required wisdom score of 0
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2022, 03:27 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
And here in lies why idiot right voters who listen to Ben Shapiro actually don’t use facts.

An abortion is made up to be your definition. You call it some medical procedure when your own party still argues it shouldn’t be preform. Morons.

Abortion to you doesn’t mean an induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.

Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
The latest Republican talking point is that if a ten year old and her parents decide not to have a baby that was the result of rape, then it's not an abortion because of reasons. You didn't watch the hearing yesterday?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-16-2022, 02:23 PM
Rainik Stormseeker Rainik Stormseeker is offline
Sarnak

Rainik Stormseeker's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ignorant zealot. You would rather roll the dice to see if a raped young girl can birth a child than abort the fetus.

Treatment for a septic uterus is an abortion

Treatment for an ectopic pregnancy is an abortion

Treatment for a miscarriage that your body won’t release is an abortion.

Stupid Bible thumpers have no place in policing others bodies to their standards of belief.
Doersn't change the fact that closer to 98% (not 90%) of all abortions, are done out of convenience/on demand.

Florida is one of the states which records reasons for all abortions, and this is from 2018 - I did the math for you since I'm not sure you are capable.

And yes, "social/economic" and "emotional/psychological" reasons are still CONVENIENCE/on-demand. Everyone has both to deal with, and neither are valid reasons for murdering a baby in the womb.

I should have included "physical health of the mother that is not life endangering", but I'll grant you that.

98% of the time, here are/were your choices to prevent pregnancy / avoid caring for a child:

1) Abstinence
2) Contraception
3) Motherhood
4) Adoption
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FL Abortions.jpg (100.2 KB, 1 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-16-2022, 02:44 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Doersn't change the fact that closer to 98% (not 90%) of all abortions, are done out of convenience/on demand.

Florida is one of the states which records reasons for all abortions, and this is from 2018 - I did the math for you since I'm not sure you are capable.

And yes, "social/economic" and "emotional/psychological" reasons are still CONVENIENCE/on-demand. Everyone has both to deal with, and neither are valid reasons for murdering a baby in the womb.

I should have included "physical health of the mother that is not life endangering", but I'll grant you that.

98% of the time, here are/were your choices to prevent pregnancy / avoid caring for a child:

1) Abstinence
2) Contraception
3) Motherhood
4) Adoption
Sucks to be a ten year old rape victim stuck in a shithole red state where all you dumbasses think it isn't morally indefensible to force one child to carry another one to term because muh bible.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-16-2022, 04:11 PM
Rainik Stormseeker Rainik Stormseeker is offline
Sarnak

Rainik Stormseeker's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sucks to be a ten year old rape victim stuck in a shithole red state where all you dumbasses think it isn't morally indefensible to force one child to carry another one to term because muh bible.
Except that I showed you she could have had that abortion in her "shithole red state" (Nice to see you've conceded Ohio), confirmed by the AG of said state, but you keep showing us you're just an ignorant moron.

Oh and that ~98% of all abortions are on demand/out of convenience, but you'll take 1,000 10-year olds being raped by illegal aliens the guy YOU voted for let in, just to break the proverbial window so we can legalize infanticide.
Last edited by Rainik Stormseeker; 07-16-2022 at 04:14 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.