Roe v. Wade

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not our fault they use human shields.

is that the case for every last one, Reiwa? you know it isn't

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is that the case for every last one, Reiwa? you know it isn't

It's not. But the practice exists, more or less.

The fault is theirs.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not. But the practice exists, more or less.

The fault is theirs.

Yeah, those fuckers should just throw their kids aside and let us incinerate them, how dare they try to prevent their own deaths!

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, those fuckers should just throw their kids aside and let us incinerate them

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is that the case for every last one, Reiwa? you know it isn't

itt rob still doesn't understand the obvious moral difference between killing perfectly healthy babies on purpose cause it's convenient, and killing a baby by accident in a warzone cause he lives nextdoor to a terrorist who is firing rockets at other innocent children. Both are obviously horrible, but it doesnt even remotely come close to the mass murder of babies, on purpose, for profit often that is abortion. Like, duh.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

itt rob still doesn't understand the obvious moral difference between killing perfectly healthy babies on purpose cause it's convenient, and killing a baby by accident in a warzone cause he lives nextdoor to a terrorist. Both are obviously horrible, but it doesnt even remotely come close to the mass murder of babies, on purpose, for profit often. Like, duh.

What about the ones that aren't accidents, Ooloo? There's a hell of a lot of those, in addition to the mountain of corpses that are "accidents". For profit, even.

[Kaveh]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

itt rob still doesn't understand the obvious moral difference between killing perfectly healthy babies on purpose cause it's convenient, and killing a baby by accident in a warzone cause he lives nextdoor to a terrorist who is firing rockets at other innocent children. Both are obviously horrible, but it doesnt even remotely come close to the mass murder of babies, on purpose, for profit often that is abortion. Like, duh.

You think people are so cold that they have abortions for convenience ? Cmon man

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Kaveh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You think people are so cold that they have abortions for convenience ? Cmon man

Ooloo is probably the biggest liar on the forums. Can't even tell himself the truth, that's why he dodges tough questions

He thinks this makes him good at arguing because The Daily Wire has warped his ability to tell facts from opinions

[red_demonman]

Originally Posted by Kaveh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You think people are so cold that they have abortions for convenience ? Cmon man

Sadly they are. If you don't believe me look at the Guttmacher institute's study (Page 4, Table 2):
https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/def...ll/3711005.pdf

[Kaveh]

Originally Posted by red_demonman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sadly they are. If you don't believe me look at the Guttmacher institute's study (Page 4, Table 2):
https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/def...ll/3711005.pdf

I’m not gonna lie to you man, I’m employed so I can’t read 9 pages from something called the Guttmacher Institute, but on page one:

“The research into U.S. women’s reasons for having abor- tions has been limited. In a 1985 study of 500 women in Kansas, unreadiness to parent was the reason most often given for having an abortion, followed by lack of financial resources and absence of a partner.”

I don’t equate those with convenience. However, I admit I only read page one so if you can tell me or show me which parts of that study, assuming it’s a reputable source, tells
Me about convenience I’m willing to change my mind. Unlike most of you, I’m a centrist fiscal conservative and have voted both ways. I welcome the information to change my mind