Here you go Libs, Explain this away, Seriously, Try.

[Gatordash]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

99% of people don’t want that dude in a pool with their daughter. I voted for Biden and I approve this message

"If you don't like me winning women's swimming, you can suck my dick" -Lea probably

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gatordash [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"If you don't like me winning women's swimming, you can suck my dick" -Lea probably

Did you hear how the new Supreme Court justice nominee couldn’t define what a woman was when asked?

This means that she technically doesn’t know if she is a woman. Therefore she shouldn’t have been eligible for the “black, female” requirement. If she doesn’t know what a woman is, and has a higher education level than Joe Biden, then he also shouldn’t be qualified to pick a woman for the Supreme Court

Also, if the Supreme Court cannot determine what a woman is, then all women-centered legal programs should be thrown out

This is getting really funny. Watch the dictionary and scientific community rush to change 1000+ years of science ahead of the upcoming debates. They have a time limit to do it, because “what is a woman?” is for sure going to come up as a debate question

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did you hear how the new Supreme Court justice nominee couldn’t define what a woman was when asked?

This means that she technically doesn’t know if she is a woman. Therefore she shouldn’t have been eligible for the “black, female” requirement. If she doesn’t know what a woman is, and has a higher education level than Joe Biden, then he also shouldn’t be qualified to pick a woman for the Supreme Court

Also, if the Supreme Court cannot determine what a woman is, then all women-centered legal programs should be thrown out

This is getting really funny. Watch the dictionary and scientific community rush to change 1000+ years of science ahead of the upcoming debates. They have a time limit to do it, because “what is a woman?” is for sure going to come up as a debate question

Nuh uh, she's declining to answer a question about how she would rule if confirmed to the court.

ACB couldn't opine either. They're very guarded these days in the interview hearings.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nuh uh, she's declining to answer a question about how she would rule if confirmed to the court.

ACB couldn't opine either. They're very guarded these days in the interview hearings.

Either way it looked bad. And Dems are going to get smoked in debates by that question if they can’t find a way to change biology textbooks. They’re all going to look either dumb or transphobic

I don’t have to be a vet to know what a dog is. I don’t have to be a meteorologist to tell you if the sun is out

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Either way it looked bad. And Dems are going to get smoked in debates by that question if they can’t find a way to change biology textbooks. They’re all going to look either dumb or transphobic

I don’t have to be a vet to know what a dog is. I don’t have to be a meteorologist to tell you if the sun is out

It's just custom. Thankfully the laity aren't running the asylum. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]