Master Tranix Camper

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

'Tani is a great guild leader, but he is not a GM. As far as all published GM statements go ... ie. as per the https://wiki.project1999.com/Camp_Rules ... a camp is your's, regardless of where you go in the zone (as long as you don't evac, die, leave the zone, etc.) up until the point that someone contests you.

And you don't even need that page; this is very explicit in the rules themselves:



Again, imagine an empty zone. You just killed Tranix, and now have a long time to kill ... why shouldn't you be able to go do some other camps in the meantime?

Now of course, the staff could make an exception to the camp rules for Tranix ... but to my knowledge they have not.

It’s weird that you’re still arguing this when he posted a screenshot of Blistig agreeing that the rule is what he says it is. You really can’t admit when you’re wrong can you? Lol

[loramin]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It’s weird that you’re still arguing this when he posted a screenshot of Blistig agreeing that the rule is what he says it is. You really can’t admit when you’re wrong can you? Lol

Did you actually read the screenshot; Blistig says nothing of the sort.

Show me the Blistig quote where he says "Tranix is different from every other non-raid mob on the server: you can't kill him and then go kill other stuff if no one is contesting you" and I'll be convinced.

[Chortles Snortles]

hey guys just trust me i wrote a detailed wiki about what the GMs think
(lol)

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did you actually read the screenshot; Blistig says nothing of the sort.

Show me the Blistig quote where he says "Tranix is different from every other non-raid mob on the server: you can't kill him and then go kill other stuff if no one is contesting you" and I'll be convinced.

Yeah you know him pointing at the point above him doesn’t mean he agrees with it. You’re totally right dude.

Lol it’s so laughable watching you be wrong and just absolutely refuse to admit it and double down hard. Every single time you do this haha

[PatChapp]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah you know him pointing at the point above him doesn’t mean he agrees with it. You’re totally right dude.

Lol it’s so laughable watching you be wrong and just absolutely refuse to admit it and double down hard. Every single time you do this haha

Every other well adjusted person looking at that photo knows what that arrow means. I don't think loramin actually doesn't know, I'm not sure what's going on here tbh.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by PatChapp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Every other well adjusted person looking at that photo knows what that arrow means. I don't think loramin actually doesn't know, I'm not sure what's going on here tbh.

I understand what the arrow means. I also understand that Blistig agreed with "If you're there and keeping the mobs down it's yours" ... which does not in any way contradict the Play Nice Policies.

Until someone A) kills Tranix, B) goes elsewhere in the zone to kill something else, C) continues to communicate that the camp is their's, and they return to it as soon as anyone tries to contest, but then D) the GMs give the camp to someone else ... I see no reason to doubt the default server rules, ie.

Originally Posted by Play Nice Policies

You may absolutely hunt multiple camps if no one else is contesting them. Once another party shows up asking for one of your camps it is your decision which camp you wish to claim, then they can then have their choice.

And for the record, I'm not even in favor of this rule: I think if you want to camp mob A, and you also want to camp mob B, you should risk losing your camp A the moment you take off for B. But those aren't P99 rules, as far as I can see.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I understand what the arrow means. I also understand that Blistig agreed with "If you're there and keeping the mobs down it's yours" ... which does not in any way contradict the Play Nice Policies.

Until someone A) kills Tranix, B) goes elsewhere in the zone to kill something else, C) continues to communicate that the camp is their's, and they return to it as soon as anyone tries to contest, but then D) the GMs give the camp to someone else ... I see no reason to doubt the default server rules, ie.



And for the record, I'm not even in favor of this rule: I think if you want to camp mob A, and you also want to camp mob B, you should risk losing your camp A the moment you take off for B. But those aren't P99 rules, as far as I can see.

TLDR: Loramin gets proven wrong and does absolutely anything he can to not admit he was wrong. What else is new.