Lest We Forget the 'Victims'

[hobart]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll point out that highlighting their criminal histories speaks to their state of mind chasing kyle and their status as a legitimate threat to him at the time.

No it doesn't. Unless he's a robot with facial recognition software and access to some sort of criminal database.

He went to own libs. He owned some libs. He should be punished. Murder, manslaughter, reckless something or other? I'm not sure which of these he's technically guilty of, but he should be found guilty.

[Skarne]

Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it doesn't. Unless he's a robot with facial recognition software and access to some sort of criminal database.

He went to own libs. He owned some libs. He should be punished. Murder, manslaughter, reckless something or other? I'm not sure which of these he's technically guilty of, but he should be found guilty.

Except that he’s not guilty and was a clear case of self defense. You’re blinded dude and you need to take a step back.

I’ve said this before, I lean left. The videos were clear as day. The folks attacking him were fanatic maniacs just like the folks defending those people. Just like the right has fanatics who are blinded.

[hobart]

Originally Posted by Skarne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except that he’s not guilty and was a clear case of self defense. You’re blinded dude and you need to take a step back.

I’ve said this before, I lean left. The videos were clear as day. The folks attacking him were fanatic maniacs just like the folks defending those people. Just like the right has fanatics who are blinded.

This has turned out to be all about politics, but it should not have.

I don't care which way you "lean". I don't want non-cops arming themselves and inserting themselves into dangerous situations where they'll inevitably end up killing someone - even if that someone was a piece of shit.

Free licenses for politically radicalized nutjobs to kill politically radicalized nutjobs on the "other side". Just arm yourself, head to a site of unrest, and press and press until you get the result you're waiting for.

[Skarne]

Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This has turned out to be all about politics, but it should not have.

I don't care which way you "lean". I don't want non-cops arming themselves and inserting themselves into dangerous situations where they'll inevitably end up killing someone - even if that someone was a piece of shit.

Free licenses for politically radicalized nutjobs to kill politically radicalized nutjobs on the "other side". Just arm yourself, head to a site of unrest, and press and press until you get the result you're waiting for.

https://youtu.be/Rpq35wyDi7I

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by hobart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it doesn't. Unless he's a robot with facial recognition software and access to some sort of criminal database.

He went to own libs. He owned some libs. He should be punished. Murder, manslaughter, reckless something or other? I'm not sure which of these he's technically guilty of, but he should be found guilty.

I didn't say *kyle* knew their background, but for the rest of us, their backgrounds absolutely lend credibility to the idea that they were attacking and trying to seriously hurt kyle, not trying to "stop an active shooter" which was the only flimsy justification for their actions the prosecution could muster.