Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OHHHH, I forgot, all of your gun knowledge comes from lib journos who never held a gun, and Hollywood where the guns aren't real unless you are Alec Baldwin.

You're right, he should have shot him 2cm above the knee, and 3cm to the right of the femur to subdue him, doing the least amount of damage. We've seen the movies. Only takes 1 shot.

Narrator: And this is an actual stupid lib argument against "too many" shots from police on meth heads with guns and knives about to kill people....

You are in fact brain dead. Are you aware of this?

Do you know how long it took to shoot 4 bullets? 0.75 seconds. But I am sure you caught that in the case during arguments...

# of bullets doesn't make self-defense just or unjust. I figure 1 second to fire as many bullets as you like to eliminate a threat to one's life is fair. Next lame argument, please.

You have not disproved the analogy but only added you political view.