I don't care what political, cultural. or social values u hold

[Evia]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

god damn this post is so true it makes me angry and I agree with it 100%

But what if one person's idea,or view, of social responsibility does not align with another's? Do you simply override their will for the 'greater good'? And if so, can we really argue that forcing someone to do something against their will is the socially responsible action to take?

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Evia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But what if one person's idea,or view, of social responsibility does not align with another's? Do you simply override their will for the 'greater good'? And if so, can we really argue that forcing someone to do something against their will is the socially responsible action to take?

I dunno
It seems to be legal to knowingly transmit HIV to another person without telling them, so *shrugs*

[Mead]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dunno
It seems to be legal to knowingly transmit HIV to another person without telling them, so *shrugs*

https://www.wesh.com/article/central...tners/37107940

?

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Evia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But what if one person's idea,or view, of social responsibility does not align with another's? Do you simply override their will for the 'greater good'? And if so, can we really argue that forcing someone to do something against their will is the socially responsible action to take?

If it comes to it, the courts can decide. Minutiae needn’t be legislated.

Was an argument of do no harm, not ‘for the greater good’.

Yes, but that isn’t related to what I posted. I stated people are liable for the harm they cause, not that they can’t go around harming for people. My argument was more punitive than preventative rhetoric, which I appreciate is out of character.