End Times

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Japan will soon begin releasing 250 million gallons of Fukushima nuclear plant water into the Pacific Ocean.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List...clear_reactors

[Ennewi]

So if you vacation in Japan, you'll order anything off the menu caught locally?

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So if you vacation in Japan, you'll order anything off the menu caught locally?

Locally I'd be more concerned with rice-water runoff than an internationally regulated and approved release of severely diluted tritium water.

Scale and stuff.

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Locally I'd be more concerned with rice-water runoff than an internationally regulated and approved release of severely diluted tritium water.

Scale and stuff.

https://youtu.be/SLxVQYuvToo
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world...318223572.html

Except neighboring countires, South Korea and China.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1089852

[Ennewi]

https://youtu.be/ucuUfsm2DRY

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://youtu.be/SLxVQYuvToo
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world...318223572.html

Except neighboring countires, South Korea and China.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1089852

I'm with the elderly fisherman. You're spreading the 'damaging rumors' he referred to.

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pres...al-grossi-says

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm with the elderly fisherman. You're spreading the 'damaging rumors' he referred to.

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pres...al-grossi-says

That was part of the point, it looks/sounds bad and so it's going to be bad for business. That's why I linked it. Even in the best case scenario, the disaster was going to have a lasting negative impact on other forms of income. How should people, such as the fisherman, be compensated? You're siding with the UN (watchdog) which means, no, you aren't on the side of the fisherman. That demands another Simpsons clip...

https://youtu.be/g2wpk8lPUQQ

And another article...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...anese-disaster

Tue 15 Mar 2011 16.34 EDT
The UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, has come under fire for its response to Japan's nuclear crisis and its record in monitoring nuclear safety.

The scrutiny has focused on the agency's secretary general, Yukiya Amano, a Japanese diplomat who got the job in 2009 after energetic lobbying by Tokyo. Amano and his team have been blamed for long delays in issuing updates on the disaster at Fukushima.

Nuclear officials argued that the fault lay not so much with the agency in Vienna as with its largely toothless mandate, which leaves it dependent on member states for voluntary compliance and control of information.

The fiercest criticism came from a former Soviet nuclear expert who helped organise the clean-up after the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. Iouli Andreev said that corporations had deliberately ignored the lessons of Chernobyl in the pursuit of profit and had been abetted by the negligence of the agency.

"After Chernobyl, all the force of the nuclear industry was directed to hide this event, for not creating damage to their reputation. The Chernobyl experience was not studied properly because who has money for studying? Only industry. But industry doesn't like it," Andreev told Reuters news agency.

He once ran the Soviet Spetsatom agency involved in the Chernobyl clean-up. He now teaches on nuclear safety and has served as an adviser to Austria's environment ministry.

Andreev said that in order to cut costs, spent fuel rods at Fukushima had been too closely stacked in pools near the nuclear reactors. One of those pools caught fire, dispersing radioactivity into the atmosphere.

"The Japanese were very greedy and they used every square inch of the space. But when you have a dense placing of spent fuel in the basin, you have a high possibility of fire if the water is removed from the basin," Andreev said.

He said the agency was too close to the corporations to enforce standards properly. "This is only a fake organisation because every organisation which depends on the nuclear industry – and the IAEA depends on the nuclear industry – cannot perform properly ... It always will try to hide the reality."

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was part of the point, it looks/sounds bad and so it's going to be bad for business. That's why I linked it. Even in the best case scenario, the disaster was going to have a lasting negative impact on other forms of income. How should people, such as the fisherman, be compensated? You're siding with the UN (watchdog) which means, no, you aren't on the side of the fisherman. That demands yet another Simpsons clip...

https://youtu.be/g2wpk8lPUQQ

And another article...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...anese-disaster

I didn't know IAEA was under the UN, which is a captured body. Best not to listen to them except the security council and even then [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cheerfully withdrawn