Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2021, 07:35 AM
sydbarrett25 sydbarrett25 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by remen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In voice:

Jutebox: "Cycle camp since those mobs got so close up here...I would hate to see them come up here"

As train comes in:
"We should have cycled!"
"Apparently not everybody did"
Klaz wasnt in our coms, at least dont think he was. He should have cycled
__________________
Zigzagwanderer
Zigzagdreams
  #2  
Old 06-20-2021, 07:47 AM
remen remen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sydbarrett25 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Klaz wasnt in our coms, at least dont think he was. He should have cycled
How can you be so obtuse? Is it deliberate?

Clearly the point is that members of your raid were aware that your raid was in social range of the mobs and should have cycled camp, but didn't.
  #3  
Old 06-20-2021, 08:25 AM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

Even if Klaz was at fault, which I've seen no conclusive evidence of, what did the train actually change? In an alternate universe where no train occurs, Riot still wipes trying to AE Vulak's guards (again, kudos to the Riot brain trust on that brilliant strategy), and Vanquish still kills Vulak. You guys had all the time in the world to recover, so I'm assuming you engaged at full strength, and if you didn't, that's kind of on you for rushing when you had no reason to.

This is just another instance of Riot (and their B-Team, Kittens) trying to rule lawyer free mobs that they know they can rarely get competitively. AFAIK, Riot has still never killed a Vulak without either clearing 4 way or killing a guard or two. They just can't compete in the current early engage meta that requires a 6 guard kite and 4 way train away. When they do get Vulak it is either because Vanq has low numbers and Riot can clear without worrying about Vanq doing their normal engage, or because 4 way was clear already from killing a blocker.

Again, if the shoe was on the other foot, Riot would be making the same arguments Vanq is making. We've seen them make the exact same arguments before. The Doze example I gave earlier is a similar "train" scenario, and there are a number of situations where Riot has felt that allowing the other guild a fair shot at the mob should suffice (I remember a Dagarn ledge train specifically). This is a prime example of the double standard that both guilds are admittedly guilty of at times. If we want to set the precedent that allowing the other entity a shot at engage is sufficient (which imo we absolutely should as it would reduce petition quest), here is a great opportunity to set it.

But we all know that isn't what Riot's leadership actually wants. Some people (Arcler, JB, Jute, Space) clearly love this elf lawyer BS and getting up on their soap box in the UN, so they'll continue to play the victim until the shoe is on the other foot, and then pretend Vanquish submitting similar petitions is causing toxicity.
  #4  
Old 06-20-2021, 08:30 AM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 444
Default

The thread title is an admission that Vanquish decided not to concede Vulak not because of the facts of what obviously happened, but because KT went to petition. Lol.
__________________
Nexii Vanadis <Gravity> | Nexii's Erotic Adventures
  #5  
Old 06-20-2021, 10:51 AM
remen remen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The thread title is an admission that Vanquish decided not to concede Vulak not because of the facts of what obviously happened, but because KT went to petition. Lol.
The thread title was created by one member of the guild. To extrapolate that into the decision making and mindset of Vanquish as a whole demonstrates a lack of intelligence.

Vanquish decided not to concede Vulak because we didn't train you.
  #6  
Old 06-20-2021, 10:49 AM
k9quaint k9quaint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even if Klaz was at fault, which I've seen no conclusive evidence of, what did the train actually change? In an alternate universe where no train occurs, Riot still wipes trying to AE Vulak's guards (again, kudos to the Riot brain trust on that brilliant strategy), and Vanquish still kills Vulak. You guys had all the time in the world to recover, so I'm assuming you engaged at full strength, and if you didn't, that's kind of on you for rushing when you had no reason to.

This is just another instance of Riot (and their B-Team, Kittens) trying to rule lawyer free mobs that they know they can rarely get competitively. AFAIK, Riot has still never killed a Vulak without either clearing 4 way or killing a guard or two. They just can't compete in the current early engage meta that requires a 6 guard kite and 4 way train away. When they do get Vulak it is either because Vanq has low numbers and Riot can clear without worrying about Vanq doing their normal engage, or because 4 way was clear already from killing a blocker.

Again, if the shoe was on the other foot, Riot would be making the same arguments Vanq is making. We've seen them make the exact same arguments before. The Doze example I gave earlier is a similar "train" scenario, and there are a number of situations where Riot has felt that allowing the other guild a fair shot at the mob should suffice (I remember a Dagarn ledge train specifically). This is a prime example of the double standard that both guilds are admittedly guilty of at times. If we want to set the precedent that allowing the other entity a shot at engage is sufficient (which imo we absolutely should as it would reduce petition quest), here is a great opportunity to set it.

But we all know that isn't what Riot's leadership actually wants. Some people (Arcler, JB, Jute, Space) clearly love this elf lawyer BS and getting up on their soap box in the UN, so they'll continue to play the victim until the shoe is on the other foot, and then pretend Vanquish submitting similar petitions is causing toxicity.
If you had conceded, we would have taken the free Vulak and tried the science next week. In any case, Vanquish will implode eventually. The same group always have in the past, and probably always will. We just have to be patient while you are in your pupal stage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
I keep meaning to put a signature on, then I forget to...
  #7  
Old 06-20-2021, 11:28 AM
Hotel Hotel is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k9quaint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you had conceded, we would have taken the free Vulak and tried the science next week. In any case, Vanquish will implode eventually. The same group always have in the past, and probably always will. We just have to be patient while you are in your pupal stage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
every guild ever has risen and fallen on this server, so yes, vanquish will die at some point

however, your guild is DYING, and i source your population numbers that respond to vulak bat phones as evidence of this

that is very different
  #8  
Old 06-20-2021, 11:41 AM
Ennewi Ennewi is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
however, your guild is DYING, and i source your population numbers that respond to vulak bat phones as evidence of this
A pandemic has subsided and the weather has warmed... Confirmation bias strikes again.
__________________
Active MRE | MIA Mains
Active UNO | SEB | FME| EVG | SOB | LEG Alts
  #9  
Old 06-20-2021, 11:42 AM
Hotel Hotel is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A pandemic has subsided and the weather has warmed... Confirmation bias strikes again.
how is looking at a data point over time confirmation bias?

am i wrong that riot vulak responders has gone down over time?
  #10  
Old 06-20-2021, 11:38 AM
2eazy4 2eazy4 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 50
Default

If kittens was invited last week ya could’ve tried that strat on a uncontested vulak 😂😂


Quote:
Originally Posted by k9quaint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you had conceded, we would have taken the free Vulak and tried the science next week. In any case, Vanquish will implode eventually. The same group always have in the past, and probably always will. We just have to be patient while you are in your pupal stage [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.