![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Zigzagwanderer
Zigzagdreams | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Clearly the point is that members of your raid were aware that your raid was in social range of the mobs and should have cycled camp, but didn't. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Even if Klaz was at fault, which I've seen no conclusive evidence of, what did the train actually change? In an alternate universe where no train occurs, Riot still wipes trying to AE Vulak's guards (again, kudos to the Riot brain trust on that brilliant strategy), and Vanquish still kills Vulak. You guys had all the time in the world to recover, so I'm assuming you engaged at full strength, and if you didn't, that's kind of on you for rushing when you had no reason to.
This is just another instance of Riot (and their B-Team, Kittens) trying to rule lawyer free mobs that they know they can rarely get competitively. AFAIK, Riot has still never killed a Vulak without either clearing 4 way or killing a guard or two. They just can't compete in the current early engage meta that requires a 6 guard kite and 4 way train away. When they do get Vulak it is either because Vanq has low numbers and Riot can clear without worrying about Vanq doing their normal engage, or because 4 way was clear already from killing a blocker. Again, if the shoe was on the other foot, Riot would be making the same arguments Vanq is making. We've seen them make the exact same arguments before. The Doze example I gave earlier is a similar "train" scenario, and there are a number of situations where Riot has felt that allowing the other guild a fair shot at the mob should suffice (I remember a Dagarn ledge train specifically). This is a prime example of the double standard that both guilds are admittedly guilty of at times. If we want to set the precedent that allowing the other entity a shot at engage is sufficient (which imo we absolutely should as it would reduce petition quest), here is a great opportunity to set it. But we all know that isn't what Riot's leadership actually wants. Some people (Arcler, JB, Jute, Space) clearly love this elf lawyer BS and getting up on their soap box in the UN, so they'll continue to play the victim until the shoe is on the other foot, and then pretend Vanquish submitting similar petitions is causing toxicity. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
The thread title is an admission that Vanquish decided not to concede Vulak not because of the facts of what obviously happened, but because KT went to petition. Lol.
__________________
Nexii Vanadis <Gravity> | Nexii's Erotic Adventures
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Vanquish decided not to concede Vulak because we didn't train you. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I keep meaning to put a signature on, then I forget to...
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
however, your guild is DYING, and i source your population numbers that respond to vulak bat phones as evidence of this that is very different | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
am i wrong that riot vulak responders has gone down over time? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
If kittens was invited last week ya could’ve tried that strat on a uncontested vulak 😂😂
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|