During the non-planned capitol insurrection.

[Byue]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did I ever say massive voter fraud occurred? Talk about making inferences. I’m saying that a security system that touts a lack of successful catches as the only necessary evidence that the threat isn’t significant is stupid logic

Anything more than that inferred is mental gymnastics on your part. Stretch first

I’m saying voter fraud occurs. It did before 2016, and it will after

Oh, I mean, most democratic countries have figured out how to run election without scams for a while now but maybe the US is severely lagging behind?

I think virtually everyone agree that whatever it is human do, someone is going to cheat but do you know how difficult it would be to vote in person for different people, the time it would take you in a day and you would have swayed what, 4-5 votes in a day?

Voter fraud is very real, and we actually usually have evidence for it.
It's just never been on the scale you guys fetishizes about.


But if you want to believe that there was a fraud you cant prove because the Americans are just very bad at running free and fair elections, this is your prerogative.


All I know is that there is massive evidence the Russian interfered with the 2016 elections yet you refuse to debate that but you totally not planned to attack the capitol during a day 45 asked you to be there to fight like hell for your country because of voter fraud you cannot prove.

Wild, no?

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I’m saying that a security system that touts a lack of successful catches as the only necessary evidence that the threat isn’t significant is stupid logic.

lol. this is gold.
I'm keeping this useful quote.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Byue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Voter fraud is very real, and we actually usually have evidence for it

K, how is that again? I understand the concept that we have evidence when we catch someone breaking the law

Now how does prove something about the number of people potentially not getting caught for breaking that law. Because when someone gets away with breaking a law, we actually DON’T have any evidence of it

It's just never been on the scale you guys fetishizes about.

Oops, was I out of conservative hive-mind sync when I strayed from the “massive voter fraud occurred” talking point?

Yknow I did miss the last two secret white supremacy meetings, where we were issued our checks from the banking sector Grand Wizards

This is why I’m out of sync

[Byue]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

K, how is that again? I understand the concept that we have evidence when we catch someone breaking the law

Now how does prove something about the number of people potentially not getting caught for breaking that law. Because when someone gets away with breaking a law, we actually DON’T have any evidence of it



Oops, was I out of conservative hive-mind sync when I strayed from the “massive voter fraud occurred” talking point?

Yknow I did miss the last two secret white supremacy meetings, where we were issued our checks from the banking sector Grand Wizards

This is why I’m out of sync

Can someone explain to this guy how we find things we don't know about?
Like how to make metal birds fly or car go vrrr or guns go PEW loudly and super fast.

I'll let you in on a secret: there are hell of a lot smarter people than we, out there.
Because you don't know how doesn't mean humans don't know how.

So uhm, basically, here is how you find out about things, welcome to grade 8 science class.

Make an observation.
Ask a question.
Form a hypothesis, or testable explanation.
Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
Test the prediction.
Iterate: use the results to make new hypotheses or predictions.

Bro, the law is rather clear and simple.
Those are the parameters.

Do you know what a wargame is?
"wargame" it out with a bunch of smart people.
Oh shit, this could be...
problematic.

I'm surprised you made it out of the teenage years, someone must have taken a great deal of a good care for you because goddamn you are not the most thawed pogo in the box.

Edit: how does the police find criminals unless they just happen to be there when the crime was committed? Like if you seen it, you seen it but how do you catch people you haven't seen commit crimes?

lol.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Byue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can someone explain to this guy how we find things we don't know about?

I'll admit, this question is tough. This is the first time I can say I am pretty stumped

I might have to actually put a pin in this and come back after doing some research. Hang on

Oh yeah, you improve your security system. My 5 year old antivirus program doesn't catch shit, but then I patched it and holy shit! Look at all the trojans I had picked up from only surfing warez and free mp3 sites. Who knew that was all it would take was improving security to find all the things that slipped past my old security

Mail in voting will never be as secure as in person voting. That's why mail in voting on a scale even remotely this large didn't exist in the USA pre-covid. Even by democrats it was seen as a necessary risk, because they viewed the health risk of in person voting as greater (or so they claimed, I agree to disagree with them on this one)

Did it result in massive voter fraud? I was saying no long before any other conservative was

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Byue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll let you in on a secret: there are hell of a lot smarter people than we, out there.
Because you don't know how doesn't mean humans don't know how

So are we relying on the "people smarter than I created these systems to enforce our laws, therefore they have no potential failings" explanation?

So we can apply this concept to the use of lethal force?

Oh, and capital punishment?

I mean people like to armchair critique the fuck out of those, but if law enforcement is a bunch of smartie scientist types, then they probably are getting everything else right too