The mueller report is catching up

[Gravydoo II]

Not to mention this.
MOOTNESS
Moreover, even if the requested relief could issue against the Secretary of State, the Court
notes that the complaint and emergency motion were not filed until approximately 4:00 p.m. on
November 4, 2020—despite being announced to various media outlets much earlier in the day. By
the time this action was filed, the votes had largely been counted, and the counting is now
complete. Accordingly, and even assuming the requested relief were available against the
Secretary of State—and overlooking the problems with the factual and evidentiary record noted
above—the matter is now moot, as it is impossible to issue the requested relief. See Gleason v
Kincaid, 323 Mich App 308, 314; 917 NW2d 685 (2018)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s November 4, 2020 emergency motion for
declaratory judgment is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that proposed intervenor’s motion to intervene is
DENIED as MOOT.


But here we go. So I took criminal justice in high school and they didnt explain ANYTHING about court documents or how to read them but some how my antifa super soldier brain can make sense of this.

Basically, they said "since you waited til 4pm, after a shitload of votes were counted, you started to lose, you tried to file this as emergency relief without filling out your paperwork properly. Thanks for wasting americas time."

[G13]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not to mention this.
MOOTNESS
Moreover, even if the requested relief could issue against the Secretary of State, the Court
notes that the complaint and emergency motion were not filed until approximately 4:00 p.m. on
November 4, 2020—despite being announced to various media outlets much earlier in the day. By
the time this action was filed, the votes had largely been counted, and the counting is now
complete. Accordingly, and even assuming the requested relief were available against the
Secretary of State—and overlooking the problems with the factual and evidentiary record noted
above—the matter is now moot, as it is impossible to issue the requested relief. See Gleason v
Kincaid, 323 Mich App 308, 314; 917 NW2d 685 (2018)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s November 4, 2020 emergency motion for
declaratory judgment is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that proposed intervenor’s motion to intervene is
DENIED as MOOT.


But here we go. So I took criminal justice in high school and they didnt explain ANYTHING about court documents or how to read them but some how my antifa super soldier brain can make sense of this.

Basically, they said "since you waited til 4pm, after a shitload of votes were counted, you started to lose, you tried to file this as emergency relief without filling out your paperwork properly. Thanks for wasting americas time."

I thought you had proof evidence was allowed inside a courtroom

Where is it?

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I thought you had proof evidence was allowed inside a courtroom

Where is it?

I never said that. I was asking you for it. I was asking you to show us the injustice in the case. Like, why it was unfair to trumps lawyers. Read it again.

Also, the burden of proof is on the accuser. You're the one making claims of unfairness, cheating, and fraud. You dont get to shift that burden and try to play the prove a negative game. I cant prove there was no cheating, its a negative. How can I prove there is nothing of something? Nobody can. That means its on you.

You made the claim that evidence was "not allowed in court". You substantiated it with that court case. The court case provided why it didnt allow the case to proceed. That was your claim, not mine. My claim was "I dont believe you".

[G13]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never said that. I was asking you for it. I was asking you to show us the injustice in the case. Like, why it was unfair to trumps lawyers. Read it again.

Also, the burden of proof is on the accuser. You're the one making claims of unfairness, cheating, and fraud. You dont get to shift that burden and try to play the prove a negative game. I cant prove there was no cheating, its a negative. How can I prove there is nothing of something? Nobody can. That means its on you.

You made the claim that evidence was "not allowed in court". You substantiated it with that court case. The court case provided why it didnt allow the case to proceed. That was your claim, not mine. My claim was "I dont believe you".

You made a big spectacle pretending evidence was allowed in court

What happened?

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You made a big spectacle pretending evidence was allowed in court

What happened?

It is when you fill out the paper work properly with dates, times, names, locations, and every other detail to make it verifiable. Like I said, you dont get to submit a claim to the court as vauge as "we didnt get meaningful access" and "I was made to leave". You see how thats just not enough to proceed? If that was the standard I could pay 200 bucks to start a case right now and tie up whatever or whoever i wanted with a claim of "they cheated me" or "sam owes me 10,000 dollars" and that was all i put down as to what was actually wrong.

If you even bothered to read any of that, thats it. You tried, ill give you that.

[G13]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is when you fill out the paper work properly with dates, times, names, locations, and every other detail to make it verifiable. Like I said, you dont get to submit a claim to the court as vauge as "we didnt get meaningful access" and "I was made to leave". You see how thats just not enough to proceed? If that was the standard I could pay 200 bucks to start a case right now and tie up whatever or whoever i wanted with a claim of "they cheated me" or "sam owes me 10,000 dollars" and that was all i put down as to what was actually wrong.

If you even bothered to read any of that, thats it. You tried, ill give you that.

Again, back to my original point

The evidence was never allowed in court and judged on it's merits

That's why we're having audits. Hopefully multiple audits can be done in every state and we can get into those machines

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, back to my original point

The evidence was never allowed in court and judged on it's merits

That's why we're having audits. Hopefully multiple audits can be done in every state and we can get into those machines

It was already judged moot. Your audits mean nothing and are a waste of time.