![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
Okay I don't feel like weighing the truth of this claim right now, but it was easy enough to pull some threads about mez/mem-blur from the eq-archives, so here they are.
1. October 2000 thread from castersrealm forums, pretty good comments about effectiveness: https://web.archive.org/web/20001211...ML/000811.html 2. June 2002 thread from castersrealm forums, a little out of era but still worth a read, mentions an 'upgrade patch' that might be worth nailing down, probably in Luclin if I had to guess: https://forums.crgaming.com/cgi-bin/...c&f=9&t=007423 3. Nov 2003 thread from therunes.net (enchanter class site), touches on the 1% issue and it maybe not being totally accurate, pretty far out of era though, idk: https://web.archive.org/web/20040104...php?p=9731& 4. Jan 2004 thread on Castersrealm, along with #1 it mentions that a chanter refreshing mez will never get a blur chance on a refresh of the mez, only if mez is not already active on the mob, also applies for other enchanters trying to refresh a mez. Again, rather far out of era though: https://web.archive.org/web/20041107...p?p=861536& 5. This eqenchanters mailing list post from March 2000 says the following: Quote:
6. CastersRealm forums thread from June 2002 that is pretty detailed and has logs of tests comparing mem blurs and mez/enthrall etc, defo worth a read: https://web.archive.org/web/20020718...c&f=9&t=007338 7. CastersRealm forums thread from November 1999 talking about mez and blur chances: https://web.archive.org/web/20000606...ML/000002.html 8. Everlore page for Memory Blur, in era, but not much here, typical low-quality Everlore page. https://web.archive.org/web/20010714...ory+Blur&type= | |||
|
|