Seal Team removes ourselves from all player agreements

[Seducio]

Nirgon is correct.

It would be like if the USA left the UN. The UN would no longer have authority.

Such a move isn't the end of an agreement as much as the withdrawal from the organization that requires the might of the top dog to exist in the first place.

[hightension]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nirgon is correct.

It would be like if the USA left the UN. The UN would no longer have authority.

Great analogy with the UN. The US has only pretended to want multilateralism via the UN to be able to further the extent of their power base and deny others a seat at the table, no real interest in making the world a better place. And when they take criticism, they don't pay their bills and threaten to leave in a self righteous huff.

[Vizax_Xaziv]

Originally Posted by hightension [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Great analogy with the UN. The US has only pretended to want multilateralism via the UN to be able to further the extent of their power base and deny others a seat at the table, no real interest in making the world a better place. And when they take criticism, they don't pay their bills and threaten to leave in a self righteous huff.

Hell, the UN allowed to United States and it's partners to invade TWO counties without consequence.

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hell, the UN allowed to United States and it's partners to invade TWO counties without consequence.

You clearly do not know how power works in the real world. The USA does not need permission from anyone to defend its interests.

[Vizax_Xaziv]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You clearly do not know how power works in the real world. The USA does not need permission from anyone to defend its interests.

Lol "defend it's interests" or the interests of the oil corporations?

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol "defend it's interests" or the interests of the oil corporations?

This is the Green forum. Stick to the topic. I've seen you can be insightful.

[Bones]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol "defend it's interests" or the interests of the oil corporations?

They are one and the same. Since the dawn of time a countries "interests" has usually been resources, in one form or another. Oil is one of if not the most important resource in the modern world outside of maybe fresh water and food. Oil corporations benefit from it, but they don't do it for them, oil benefits the entire country, it keeps the economy running, etc.

[Bach]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nirgon is correct.

It would be like if the USA left the UN. The UN would no longer have authority.

Such a move isn't the end of an agreement as much as the withdrawal from the organization that requires the might of the top dog to exist in the first place.

As proven, the top doc are the GM and server owners.

If they déclare something you shut up or leave, you do not throw a temper tantrum and act like a 2 year old crybaby.

The truth is ST got away with a lot of shit stirring since green.
They thought it was the perfect opportunity to score some nobles for free since they clearly suck at it, they were probably gonna rejoint with some more demands as usual.

St do not want fair competition, because as shown with nobles, they wouldn't score much being able to use their zerg.

But they pushed too far, not only breaking UN agreement and server agreement of 72 hrs notice.

But the super dickish move if deleting the UN AND stealin open raid target from the server.

The truth is ST have shown their true color to the whole server, this is the kind of BS non sens other guild leaders had to deal with.

All those baselss justification for being a dick you see from st/dmo member in this thread, imagine that time 20 un the UN and you'll get something somewhat close to the level of toxicity.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Bach [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As proven, the top doc are the GM and server owners.

If they déclare something you shut up or leave, you do not throw a temper tantrum and act like a 2 year old crybaby.

The truth is ST got away with a lot of shit stirring since green.
They thought it was the perfect opportunity to score some nobles for free since they clearly suck at it, they were probably gonna rejoint with some more demands as usual.

St do not want fair competition, because as shown with nobles, they wouldn't score much being able to use their zerg.

But they pushed too far, not only breaking UN agreement and server agreement of 72 hrs notice.

But the super dickish move if deleting the UN AND stealin open raid target from the server.

The truth is ST have shown their true color to the whole server, this is the kind of BS non sens other guild leaders had to deal with.

All those baselss justification for being a dick you see from st/dmo member in this thread, imagine that time 20 un the UN and you'll get something somewhat close to the level of toxicity.

Calling someone a cry baby is a bit rich when lots of your posts are lengthy posts essentially criticizing/crying about things.

And for the record I have no affiliation with ST, I’m just making a general observation

[Bach]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Calling someone a cry baby is a bit rich when lots of your posts are lengthy posts essentially criticizing/crying about things.

And for the record I have no affiliation with ST, I’m just making a general observation

This is called a discussion, you re welcome to not take part in it.