Donation Rewards

[amaterasu]

I hope the higher petition priorities are not being considered.
Here is my reasoning:

In a dispute between two players where a gm is being asked to intervene, objectivity should be the main goal.

When (1) the GM is aware that the petitioner has been placed on a list for donating X amount; and (2) the player is aware that the gm knows he has donated +X amount, the player may be expecting special treatment and the gm may rule subjectively, even without intending to.

On live, accounts would be given a flag only visible to the gm after negative behavior, and the flag would affect the gm's judgment immediately if the gm received a petition from or about that player, even though the situation where the player earned the flag may have had nothing to do with the current situation in question.