2020 Post Election MEGAthread

[cd288]

Originally Posted by White_knight [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

(CNN) The Justice Department's top election crimes prosecutor resigned Monday in protest after Attorney General William Barr told federal prosecutors that they should examine allegations of voting irregularities before states move to certify results in the coming weeks.

Oh O...sounds suspect...does he know the Dem's did dodgy shit?????

He resigned because he thought it was unacceptable to conduct any investigations before results are certified (because you’re not supposed to do that until results have been certified). He wasn’t comfortable being asked to violate normal procedures just because two fat guys decided to make up claims of election fraud.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He resigned because he thought it was unacceptable to conduct any investigations before results are certified (because you’re not supposed to do that until results have been certified). He wasn’t comfortable being asked to violate normal procedures just because two fat guys decided to make up claims of election fraud.

So you're supposed to certify the results, and then un-certify them by investigating potential impropriety? Why would that be the procedure? The whole point is that they shouldn't be certified because they might not be legitimate in certain key areas.

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Democrats are so smart that they engineered this massive nationwide fraud effort that managed to take into account every state’s myriad of intricate differences in the way they count and process ballots. But don’t stop there. The Democrats are so smart that they did this massive fraud effort just to allow the Republicans to pick up seats in the House and continue to control the Senate...geniuses!!!

Fraud need only occur in certain key counties of certain key states, that's the gripe. And if you were to do something like this, you'd probably want it to look super close and not obviously sketchy by like flipping some redneck state blue. Like I said before I don't think this is going to amount to much, but it should be thoroughly investigated. I don't understand opposition to investigating it as much as possible, if only because I want to actually know what is occuring in the country I live in.

[Mota]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't understand opposition to investigating it as much as possible, if only because I want to actually know what is occuring in the country I live in.

Man wait until you start investigating how Trump surrounded himself by people who are now in prison, and his lawyer (also in prison) says Trump almost certainly does lots of illegal shit.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you're supposed to certify the results, and then un-certify them by investigating potential impropriety? Why would that be the procedure? The whole point is that they shouldn't be certified because they might not be legitimate in certain key areas.



Fraud need only occur in certain key counties of certain key states, that's the gripe. And if you were to do something like this, you'd probably want it to look super close and not obviously sketchy by like flipping some redneck state blue. Like I said before I don't think this is going to amount to much, but it should be thoroughly investigated. I don't understand opposition to investigating it as much as possible, if only because I want to actually know what is occuring in the country I live in.

I’m not against investigation, and the Democrats have said they aren’t either if you present actual evidence. So far there have been multiple court cases shot down for lack of evidence; so it’s certainly not that claims aren’t being brought it’s that every time they go to court the Republicans can’t display any evidence at all. I mean, one case was based on one woman who said she received a sticky note that said there was a problem with ballot counting but when she was asked she couldn’t provide a name or any other details. I’m another case, the Republican lawyer literally conceded in court that observers had been allowed within viewing distance of the counting in a case where they had claimed they weren’t lol. It’s just all baseless and we’re seeing that as they continue to go to court. Although I do think it’s funny how Trump supporters were adamantly against any investigation of Trump for anything during his Presidency, but now they’re like “well what’s wrong with an investigation?” Lol

Trump is a pussy. Like I said, I’ve spent time with him personally before. He absolutely cannot stand losing and will whine and make excuses for it because he’s such a shallow fragile person. Best memory I have is me and a couple guys were playing golf with him at one of his clubs up here and he misses two easy puts that put him behind the leader in our foursome, picks his ball up, drops it in the hole and marks his scorecard as though he made the first put and then goes “if any of you guys complain and tell Melania or anyone else about this and hurt my standing, you’ll never play a round here again.” He’s such a tool lol