Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:25 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
... I offered to run a bot.. does that count?
Maybe but bots are usually shit geared
  #172  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:27 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree on common ground 100%.. ive read the proposals and I like AGs by far the best... are you talking about riots PoG proposal?
Specifically referring to POG and ToV server fallback rules.
  #173  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:31 PM
MarauderOHHYEAH MarauderOHHYEAH is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 115
Default

I kinda agree with their PoG proposal... to claim PoG you should have your raid mobilized and going... it promotes socking by a large force but thats kinda PoG isnt it?

FTE lock outs promote small active sockers over anything imo... when you can have a group or two of active sockers get FTE and basically hold a mob till more log on your promoting the type of neckbeard behavior that has gotten the server to this point
  #174  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:33 PM
MarauderOHHYEAH MarauderOHHYEAH is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 115
Default

But thats my opinion on it.. and opinions are like ass holes..etc etc etc
  #175  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:33 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I kinda agree with their PoG proposal... to claim PoG you should have your raid mobilized and going... it promotes socking by a large force but thats kinda PoG isnt it?

FTE lock outs promote small active sockers over anything imo... when you can have a group or two of active sockers get FTE and basically hold a mob till more log on your promoting the type of neckbeard behavior that has gotten the server to this point
Know how I can tell you weren’t here in 2017. Cause small guilds did great with lockouts. Main reason rustle was able to survive. We had 1-2 runners and that’s all ya need.

https://youtu.be/HITM6abtKVw
  #176  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:35 PM
MarauderOHHYEAH MarauderOHHYEAH is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 115
Default

I wasn't here in 2017! Well I think I had just started.. I didn't hear about this place till 2016 I think.. ( edited cause I sounded like a hick )
Last edited by MarauderOHHYEAH; 10-29-2020 at 06:37 PM..
  #177  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:37 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I wasn't here in 2017! Well I think I had just started.. I had never heard of this server till like 2016
Lockouts helped casual guilds more then anything .
  #178  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:39 PM
MarauderOHHYEAH MarauderOHHYEAH is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 115
Default

People on the forums say that... people in game say different... I can only base my opinion on how the system sounds on paper... and on paper it favors those who poop in socks
  #179  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:42 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I kinda agree with their PoG proposal... to claim PoG you should have your raid mobilized and going... it promotes socking by a large force but thats kinda PoG isnt it?

FTE lock outs promote small active sockers over anything imo... when you can have a group or two of active sockers get FTE and basically hold a mob till more log on your promoting the type of neckbeard behavior that has gotten the server to this point
Regarding lockouts, the problem here is that during non-quake situations you aren’t winning any ToV mobs without a sock force as it is. That pretty much leaves out Kittens already so not much changed there. During quakes though Kittens just needs to get an FTE on any mob and then they will have a specified time to kill that mob unfettered. During the last quake I believe it was Kittens that was engaged on Aary while FRAG were on Eashen. Eashen dies to us, Kittens wipes on Aary and then immediately loses it it because we need it out of the way to progress. With an FTE lockout Kittens would have had a full hour to kill Aary without fear of losing him. Kittens would have recovered from the wipe and killed him.

I don’t think FTE lockouts are perfect. I would prefer if we avoid them and just continue as we have been personally. However, they will reduce petitions because you won’t see two guilds trying to engage the same mob.
  #180  
Old 10-29-2020, 06:42 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarauderOHHYEAH [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People on the forums say that... people in game say different... I can only base my opinion on how the system sounds on paper... and on paper it favors those who poop in socks
Everything favors those that spend more time that's reality . But lockouts gave folks time to get there and uninterrupted while they took their shot. You would have to adjust for current rooted dragons but 3 hour lockout anyone could kill things. All it takes is someone on line few hours during windows no one says you have to sock 16 hours , rustle never did that and we got plenty.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.