Multiple camp rules, misconceptions, suggestions

[jerryR]

Originally Posted by Vdaria [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i feel that if the rules were too strict and you had to be within x feet of camps, people would lawyer others to no end. Step x+1 feet away? I have it on OBS, camp is mine now. Sow a buddy? camp is mine! Dodge a train? mine.

Furthermore, if I am holding a camp, it seems strange to hold that it invalidates my claim on that camp to kill other unclaimed monsters in the zone while I am waiting on a respawn. Why would that restriction be necessary? And if it's not necessary, why should it be imposed on people who are camping a rare spawn? By that I mean if no one is in a zone but you, who are you saving the rare mob / its PH for? Future players that may or may not be in the zone when the mob respawns? What do we owe to possible future players anyway? It seems like they don't have a right to expect to zone into a fully popped zone full of rare spawns, at any rate.

Your hyperbole glosses over the existing nuances within the rules and assumes ignorance of context. No one is imposing any restrictions. You're free to do what you want with the empty zone, but be prepared to have to contest against someone that is content with just a single part of it ?

I've never met a more entitled, unwavering arrogance than someone who has held down a couple high value targets for a few hours. I feel like your last paragraph exemplifies that 'screw everyone but me' attitude that causes more lawyer questing than anything else