Proposed amendment to Scout Roll

[Fammaden]

The only reason I can see to have a level restriction is if you are too low to contribute to the fight. Given the number of people showing up 50+ seems appropriate enough.

That being said, scout roll is one of the few successful and long running cooperative agreements surrounding a high end goal that exists in this otherwise cutthroat community. Why fuck with a good thing and potentially make it worse.

Scout isn't perfect, but it seems to be a good candidate for "if it ain't broke don't fix it". And I'm sorry but a 53 alt winning a roll doesn't make it broken. That dude could be your buddy and or guild mate next week for all you know, let him have his moment. Plenty of 55+ players win it as well, more likely they are the majority of winners.

[LazyHydras]

Originally Posted by Fammaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only reason I can see to have a level restriction is if you are too low to contribute to the fight. Given the number of people showing up 50+ seems appropriate enough.

That being said, scout roll is one of the few successful and long running cooperative agreements surrounding a high end goal that exists in this otherwise cutthroat community. Why fuck with a good thing and potentially make it worse.

Scout isn't perfect, but it seems to be a good candidate for "if it ain't broke don't fix it". And I'm sorry but a 53 alt winning a roll doesn't make it broken. That dude could be your buddy and or guild mate next week for all you know, let him have his moment. Plenty of 55+ players win it as well, more likely they are the majority of winners.

I have nothing against the person behind the player. I'm just saying that they should be of level to materially contribute to the fight in order to roll. I would gladly welcome a lvl50 as my guildmate and even help them level up so they could be useful! But, yea. I would prefer scout roll be 55+

OR

Adopt Loramin's suggestion of Bring-Your-Own-Group and /list for each group.