"Mannastone" camping jboots

[Canelek]

Ah yeah, I have heard of this tit. He has caused multiple disruptions and AFK shenanigans at various /list camps, as well as general /ooc lite-trolling. I am sure his parents are proud (as long as he continues to pay rent/clean room).

[MalystryxVoF]

report /afk non participating campers to the GM's. Llandris has posted he will happily DT them...

[Fawqueue]

Originally Posted by MalystryxVoF [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

report /afk non participating campers to the GM's. Llandris has posted he will happily DT them...

To be fair, nothing has stated you have to participate while you are on the list. If you are #1 then you better be the one progressing through the spawns, but if you are #5 it's no different than waiting for a non-list item while someone camps it. Apply this logic to Frenzied Ghoul. Now imagine someone coming to the camp, and seeing it's taken, and asking the person camping it if you can be next in-line when they are finished. That's all pretty standard, and not really different than being #2 on a Jboots list. Now imagine that the guy camping it warns you that if you don't fully participate in helping him clear the PHs he will contact a GM to have you DT'd. Does anything think that's even remotely acceptable? No, of course not. So why would it then be different for a /list camp?

[shuklak]

Originally Posted by Fawqueue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be fair, nothing has stated you have to participate while you are on the list. If you are #1 then you better be the one progressing through the spawns, but if you are #5 it's no different than waiting for a non-list item while someone camps it. Apply this logic to Frenzied Ghoul. Now imagine someone coming to the camp, and seeing it's taken, and asking the person camping it if you can be next in-line when they are finished. That's all pretty standard, and not really different than being #2 on a Jboots list. Now imagine that the guy camping it warns you that if you don't fully participate in helping him clear the PHs he will contact a GM to have you DT'd. Does anything think that's even remotely acceptable? No, of course not. So why would it then be different for a /list camp?

And yet the lunatics are having a fit because they were the required level 35 yet demand people clear the camp for them.

[Castle2.0]

Nowhere on the official /list page does it say people must participate.

As stated in multiple threads, trying to define and enforce participation is a waste of CSR time. The people not participating are just going to cast burst of flame once every 30 minutes, or toss a crap buff on whoever is at camp whenever they are back checking for AFK check.

Then, what do you do about it?

[zillabunny]

90% of people aren't pieces of shit so it's usually not a problem it's always one garbage human doing crap like in the op that ruin it for everyone else [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Spacebar]

a.) Mannastone "camping" jboots.
b.) Mannastone "camping jboots".

[completionist]

thats the point, people have been getting #1 and not helping clear spawns. thats where the DT applies.

[zillabunny]

Again this is compounded by the fact that when the boots dropped he was afk and never looted them.

[Fawqueue]

Originally Posted by zillabunny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again this is compounded by the fact that when the boots dropped he was afk and never looted them.

How was he successfully passing the AFK checks yet AFK when it came time to loot? That's the real question.