#1901
|
|||
|
If/then. You are an npc^
| ||
|
#1902
|
|||
|
If you think Donald Trump hasn't broken the law, you are a fucking retard.
__________________
I have retired from the cap making game.
Teddee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Warrior Hehateme - 60 Iksar Monk Freddee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Druid Spooee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Cleric <Vanquish> | ||
|
#1903
|
|||
|
He has to defend Trump, it is his duty as a member of the most honorable order of shitposters.
| ||
|
#1904
|
|||
|
I'm the smartest retard
| ||
|
#1905
|
|||
|
I'm proud of you
__________________
I have retired from the cap making game.
Teddee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Warrior Hehateme - 60 Iksar Monk Freddee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Druid Spooee Bearfoot - 60 Halfling Cleric <Vanquish> | ||
|
#1906
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#1908
|
|||
|
I think it sounds like some peoples opinion want to be law regardless if a large portion of the population disagrees. If they go to trial and impeachment does not proceed, will you claim that you still know more than the trial itself. Just looking for some consistency here.
I think Republicans are saying "I'm defending Trump until you can prove a law was broken in the court of law. We are not taking people's opinions as evidence." Democrats are saying "I want my opinion to be law. I don't care if quid pro quo is up for interpretation and I don't care if the people presenting the evidence might have another motive." Trump might of had an agenda with Biden but didn't release anything to the public as a smear campaign news story. Before the case even hit trial, it had been decided he is guilty. One of the comments someone made earlier as a joke was "We need to impeach him so we can figure out whether he committed a crime or not." "He committed a crime, I just don't know which one when it comes to the exact law." These are the answers of idiots. | ||
Last edited by BallzDeep; 11-26-2019 at 07:04 PM..
|
|
#1910
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|