Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2019, 01:50 PM
unleashedd unleashedd is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 408
Default

yea that regen and slam is pretty good; pay dat tax


also
Quote:
Originally Posted by Veeshan31 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one wants to interact with the loser from the manastone backfire thread.
got Grakken and Masterize on ignore already, never met em and dont plan to
  #2  
Old 11-25-2019, 02:02 PM
Grakken Grakken is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veeshan31 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one wants to interact with the loser from the manastone backfire thread.
Untrue. Plenty of people want to interact with me. And it wasn't a backfire thread. As you see people posting the same problem over and over on these forums. We just disagree and you've learned the only way to disagree with someone is to try and silence them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by unleashedd [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yea that regen and slam is pretty good; pay dat tax


also


got Grakken and Masterize on ignore already, never met em and dont plan to
Okay. If your plans change, I don't have you on ignore. 100P for 10 dose SoW pots, get 'em while they are hot.
  #3  
Old 11-25-2019, 06:31 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grakken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Untrue. Plenty of people want to interact with me. And it wasn't a backfire thread. As you see people posting the same problem over and over on these forums. We just disagree and you've learned the only way to disagree with someone is to try and silence them.



Okay. If your plans change, I don't have you on ignore. 100P for 10 dose SoW pots, get 'em while they are hot.
It was definitely a backfire thread.
  #4  
Old 11-25-2019, 07:22 PM
Grakken Grakken is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyborg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was definitely a backfire thread.
k
  #5  
Old 11-25-2019, 07:26 PM
Psyborg Psyborg is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grakken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
k
Do you honestly think you didn’t look like the asshole in that thread? It wasn’t about your opinion regarding lists it was about how you dealt with the situation. It’s understandable to want the system changed (though I think it’s fine) but to join the list and refuse to help was poor form.
  #6  
Old 11-25-2019, 07:45 PM
Grakken Grakken is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyborg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you honestly think you didn’t look like the asshole in that thread?
Nope.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyborg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
... but to join the list and refuse to help was poor form.
I disagree entirely. List has created a new social nuance and people have differing opinions about what is socially expected. I find it grossly offensive for people to assume I should farm list 1's item for them, even at list 2. I understand other's perspective to be VERY different. Right now, the rules don't dictate expectation.

My intent was to discuss the expectation and suggest a implementation to remedy the problem. People disagreeing with my suggestion or even disliking me doesn't mean it backfired. It is one of the most responded to threads in this sub. So I'd say mission accomplished.
  #7  
Old 11-26-2019, 11:14 AM
Veeshan31 Veeshan31 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 92
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grakken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nope.



I disagree entirely. List has created a new social nuance and people have differing opinions about what is socially expected. I find it grossly offensive for people to assume I should farm list 1's item for them, even at list 2. I understand other's perspective to be VERY different. Right now, the rules don't dictate expectation.

My intent was to discuss the expectation and suggest a implementation to remedy the problem. People disagreeing with my suggestion or even disliking me doesn't mean it backfired. It is one of the most responded to threads in this sub. So I'd say mission accomplished.
This idiot is still defending himself. It was the fact that you joined the group, then left when you found out the #1 person couldn't solo the mob. Then made a forum post in an attempt to get him to give up the spot. The other group members only left because you joined and were replacing their healer. This is all in screenshot proof. So the fact that you try and twist the situation is hilarious. You are a scumbag and the entire server knows it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.