28 Hours and 24 min since last Manastone

[solleks]

if you think the people that run this server are responsible for the people that play this server's well being you are out to lunch

[Almond]

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if you think the people that run this server are responsible for the people that play this server's well being you are out to lunch

Don't think anyone said the staff are directly responsible for players health.

They do have access to data that would show how long someone has been online and if they 1. Did nothing and 2. promoted a system to reward players for staying online and engaged for 50+ hours at a time.. i think they risk being held negligent and possibly liable.


If negative press is directed at Everquest the game because of a p99 50+ hour /list camps... I assure you Daybreak will look at their options to make p99 look like a rogue entity and/or get it shut down...

Is it too much to ask that we don't build systems that reward people for staying in game for 40+ hours consecutively ?

[WaffleztheAndal]

Originally Posted by Almond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't think anyone said the staff are directly responsible for players health.

They do have access to data that would show how long someone has been online and if they 1. Did nothing and 2. promoted a system to reward players for staying online and engaged for 50+ hours at a time.. i think they risk being held negligent and possibly liable.


If negative press is directed at Everquest the game because of a p99 50+ hour /list camps... I assure you Daybreak will look at their options to make p99 look like a rogue entity and/or get it shut down...

Is it too much to ask that we don't build systems that reward people for staying in game for 40+ hours consecutively ?

Just remove the fucking manastone entirely then. No one needs this thing.

[Almond]

Originally Posted by WaffleztheAndal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just remove the fucking manastone entirely then.

I would support this 100%

Just remove all legacy items and /list

[Polycaster]

Originally Posted by Almond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would support this 100%

Just remove all legacy items and /list

Shut up hippie.

Not even the people camping the legacy items want them to be common. Perhaps especially them. What people are asking for is the classic drop rate and a humane system for the list.

[Almond]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shut up hippie.

Not even the people camping the legacy items want them to be common. Perhaps especially them. What people are asking for is the classic drop rate and a humane system for the list.

Yeah.. simmer down there champ.. I would 100% support the classic drop rate also...

See when someone supports something.. it doesn't mean that's the only option they would support... so jumping in with the name calling .. just looks silly.

There are alot of options that I think the community would support... But doing nothing? leaving it as is? Will get someone hurt.

[WaffleztheAndal]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shut up hippie.

Not even the people camping the legacy items want them to be common. Perhaps especially them. What people are asking for is the classic drop rate and a humane system for the list.

These things are on literal 24/7 farm across two servers that will eventually become one, increasing the drop rate is a bad idea.

[astrological]

Originally Posted by Almond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would support this 100%

Just remove all legacy items and /list

On board!!

[solleks]

Originally Posted by Almond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They do have access to data that would show how long someone has been online and if they 1. Did nothing and 2. promoted a system to reward players for staying online and engaged for 50+ hours at a time.. i think they risk being held negligent and possibly liable.

this is so stupid

[turbosilk]

Originally Posted by Almond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't think anyone said the staff are directly responsible for players health.

They do have access to data that would show how long someone has been online and if they 1. Did nothing and 2. promoted a system to reward players for staying online and engaged for 50+ hours at a time.. i think they risk being held negligent and possibly liable.


If negative press is directed at Everquest the game because of a p99 50+ hour /list camps... I assure you Daybreak will look at their options to make p99 look like a rogue entity and/or get it shut down...

Is it too much to ask that we don't build systems that reward people for staying in game for 40+ hours consecutively ?

It's not different than the old blue raid scene. Nice try with trying to sow hysteria and FUD to get your way.