Charisma

[strawman]

Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

can you even put into words why int would be important?

From what I understand it's simply more mana = more spell casts

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by strawman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From what I understand it's simply more mana = more spell casts

More spell casts in one flurry.

How often do you go full mana to oom in one battle and die because you didn't have more max mana? It was "basically fucking never" in the 1-60 1-60 1-54 enchanters I played on p99.


Mana regen is more of a limiting factor than max mana, especially in exping/farming type groups (as oppposes to raid or solo artist type fights). And it's charisma that increases your efficiency over time by lowering resists, aka mana needed over time, not int.

[strawman]

Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More spell casts in one flurry.

How often do you go full mana to oom in one battle and die because you didn't have more max mana? It was "basically fucking never" in the 1-60 1-60 1-54 enchanters I played on p99.


Mana regen is more of a limiting factor than max mana, especially in exping/farming type groups (as oppposes to raid or solo artist type fights). And it's charisma that increases your efficiency over time by lowering resists, aka mana needed over time, not int.

This is a pretty good argument in favor of charisma. Thanks!

[TheRusty]

Originally Posted by strawman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a pretty good argument in favor of charisma. Thanks!

Yup.

My enchanter always has enough mana... except when I have resists and multiple breaks. I'm regretting not making charisma primary, but at level 13 with as tough as it is to scrape up XP, I feel like it's way too late for a reroll.

C'est la vie!