Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-26-2011, 10:15 PM
Kringe Kringe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 445
Default

No level limit would be retarded.... What needs to happen is FFA +8-8 or so with zones that are highly sought after that have minimum level requirements (46 or so and open pvp in those zones with no level limit between them and the 60s), IE: Sebilis, Karnors, (of course this is Kunark) Im not sure what zones we would classify in classic.

An across the board no level limit would just constitute in major guilds binding in places like Neriak B, Halas wherever, and killing anyone new to the population for shits and giggles, and to see their l33t Yellow text globally.
  #2  
Old 05-26-2011, 11:00 PM
wehrmacht wehrmacht is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SullonZek
Posts: 532
Send a message via AIM to wehrmacht
Default

This is pretty ironic that all these people pretending to be "hardcore" by voting for FFA want these bullshit level limits in place that turn it into some pansy blue server.

The level limits they suggest don't even make sense. A level 45-50 caster or melee can kill a level 60. The level 60 isn't invulnerable. There's no reason to prohibit them from attacking each other. If it goes team based, there's no reason to have level limits there either.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Last edited by wehrmacht; 05-26-2011 at 11:04 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.