![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I don't think doing the same is a bad idea. Green is going to feel a lot different than blue, even if you're playing the same class. Mechanics are different, kunark and velious spells and zones are absent, no gear for you or anyone else. Fights will last longer, characters will be more fragile, the world will be more crowded. Etc.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian) [35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton) [XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf) Red: [21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf) | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Playing different.
60 Enchanter on Blue. Going a big ugly Troll SK for Green. I know it will be a hell of a lot harder, but I'm in no rush and want something totally different this time around. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
60 DE SK
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
All these things increase the relative appeal of the things wizards bring to the table. I'm not sure how many people who tended to shun wizards on blue will really process all of this. But I know *I* would be more happy to see a wizard in my group on green than I would have been on blue. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|