|
|
|
|
#1
05-26-2011, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
8 levels is perfect. Melees who ding 20/30 and get new dmg caps can run around the world pvping freely without having to worry about casters with 29/39 spells targeting. It's also broad enough that you can pretty much be assured to see people within your range leveling in your zone.
And no item loot. Promotes naked caster griefing and it super defensive strategy and bagging gear.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
05-26-2011, 02:12 AM
|
|||
|
level limits are stupid and bring a large host of problems such as low level trainers, spies, healers etc, these are all things that occured on RZ and were universally despised by the entire server and is why everyone that wasnt a pvp lite carebear switched to sullon when it came out.
you dont need to get a reward (if there are any) for killing outside a given range, however being unable to kill them at all will shit things up and i likely wouldnt even bother with such a server, even wow isnt that lame. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
05-26-2011, 02:21 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
That will be REAL good for the population
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
05-26-2011, 02:24 AM
|
|||
|
To quote myself from my first post on this forum:
"Please do not use the term FFA unless you are referring a server where anybody can attack anybody at any time, i.e. Vanguard PvP. If by "FFA" you mean "Bluebie PK vs. Anti 4 lvl spread Rallos PvP," please re-title this thread appropriately." I prefer no level limit, no PvP restrictions. This was the case in Vanguard where my guild, Xanit K'Ven, dominated the server in all aspects. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
05-26-2011, 08:42 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
must be talking about the get killed all the time and take 40 people to go hide out in a keyed dungeon aspect. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
05-26-2011, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
No level limit would be retarded.... What needs to happen is FFA +8-8 or so with zones that are highly sought after that have minimum level requirements (46 or so and open pvp in those zones with no level limit between them and the 60s), IE: Sebilis, Karnors, (of course this is Kunark) Im not sure what zones we would classify in classic.
An across the board no level limit would just constitute in major guilds binding in places like Neriak B, Halas wherever, and killing anyone new to the population for shits and giggles, and to see their l33t Yellow text globally. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
05-26-2011, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
This is pretty ironic that all these people pretending to be "hardcore" by voting for FFA want these bullshit level limits in place that turn it into some pansy blue server.
The level limits they suggest don't even make sense. A level 45-50 caster or melee can kill a level 60. The level 60 isn't invulnerable. There's no reason to prohibit them from attacking each other. If it goes team based, there's no reason to have level limits there either. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
Last edited by wehrmacht; 05-26-2011 at 11:04 PM..
|
|
||
|
#9
05-27-2011, 06:43 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] these are probably the only two times i ever saw you in game actually. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
05-26-2011, 08:39 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
level 60s generally have better shit to do than waste their time killing some newb over and over, and by the time someone is level 60 all the newbs will be alts that will be choosing to stay there and get killed if such a situation arises. essentially what i am trying to say is that you are fucking retarded. | |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
