Seeking Input About Potential Change to Class Spell List on Wiki

[BarackObooma]

I like your version! I hate when the current spell descriptions goes to level 65 in some of it's calculations.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by BarackObooma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hate when the current spell descriptions goes to level 65 in some of it's calculations.

Amen to that. When I was working on the buff lines page that drove me crazy, and there are probably a bunch of buffs on that page now that are off by a single point because I didn't do the conversion math from 65 down to 60 correctly in my head [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Para99]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Amen to that. When I was working on the buff lines page that drove me crazy, and there are probably a bunch of buffs on that page now that are off by a single point because I didn't do the conversion math from 65 down to 60 correctly in my head [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Very few of them do you need to do the math in your head. Look up the spell on Lucy, go the "history" tab and scroll all the way towards the bottom. If the P99 wiki has the calculations listed for 65 there will almost always be a log on Lucy of something like this (from Forlorn Deeds)

2002-09-04 11:33 Changed Durationtext from 2.9 mins @L57 to 3.0 mins @L60 to 2.9 mins @L57 to 3.3 mins @L65

http://lucy.allakhazam.com/spellhist...12&source=Live