Bin Laden's dead

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

here's a list of organizations and people that have argued against conspiracy theories behind the 9/11 attacks: the US National Institute of Standards

Perhaps you missed my earlier post. Just about every single person you cited as so called "evidence" is an arab hating, neocon Zionist who would love nothing more than for the US to invade every muslim country on earth for them. These are all war mongering propagandists and you claim they're actually credible.

- Stephen Cauffman, Jewish Neocon Zionist - point-man on the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) cover-up of the WTC 7 controlled demolition. NIST continues to maintain that fire alone brought down WTC 7.

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Popular Mechanics magazine

Benjamin Chertoff - Jewish Neocon Zionist, the first cousin of Michael Chertoff, wrote the 9/11 hit piece in Popular Mechanics debunking “9/11 conspiracy theories.”

Michael Chertoff - Jewish Neocon Zionist, dual citizen of US and Israel, Director of Homeland Security. Co-author of patriot act

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the 9/11 Commission Report

Philip Zelikow (Jewish US-Israeli dual citizen) - wrote blatantly false 9/11 commission report

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Noam Chomsky

After being cornered on this issue for the 1000th time, eventually Noam Chomsky said "it doesn't even matter if 9/11 was a staged event", it's on video tape, you can look it up yourself. Also, why are you naming only Jewish people like they would actually be unbiased and credible on this issue?

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

MIT Engineering Professor Thomas Eagar

And guess what, here's an MIT engineer Jeff King saying the exact opposite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCLHL5iToJ8

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You cannot get thousands of people in on a conspiracy theory as horrific as mass murder without it leaking out over the course of a decade. It is not logical.

It already has leaked out. For some reason you seem to think something can only be true if every neocon Zionist on earth tells you it's a fact.

[Lazortag]

<Giegue> I just had tandoori chicken and nachos
<wehrmacht> I'm raping noobs in the bin laden thread

Wehrmacht, you are completely full of shit. You found one or two jews (not even zionists) who works with a particular organizatino so you assumed that the entire organization must no longer be credible. Seriously, you think that popular mechanics has no credibility because a few people who might be biased work with them? What I find more hilarious than anything is the circular logic in your post; for example:

- Stephen Cauffman, Jewish Neocon Zionist - point-man on the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) cover-up of the WTC 7 controlled demolition. NIST continues to maintain that fire alone brought down WTC 7.

Let me get this straight. One of the premises of your argument is that tower 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition. There is a source which claims the opposite. So to prove that this source is not credible, you are using the fact that one of the people associated with it believes that tower 7 was not brought down by a controlled demolition.

[Turtles]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wehrmacht, you are completely full of shit. You found one or two jews (not even zionists) who works with a particular organizatino so you assumed that the entire organization must no longer be credible. Seriously, you think that popular mechanics has no credibility because a few people who might be biased work with them?

That's the crux of every conspiracy theory. In the words of an MIT Engineering Professor, it's the reverse scientific method. You start with a conclusion, and work your way back -- picking out what facts fit your argument and ignoring all others. In the case of Wehrmacht, it goes like this: The Jews were responsible for 9/11.

All of government: Pro-Zionist
9/11 Commission Report: Jews involved
Popular Mechanics: Jews involved
NIST: Jews involved

You can do it with anything. I blame it on marijuana. This was the only way for the neocon marijuan-ists to divert attention from the drug war.

George W. Bush: acknowledged using marijuana
Barack Obama: acknowledged using marijuana
Osama bin Laden: high strength marijuana plants found yards from his home (seriously)
Media: liberal, pro-legalization hippies
9/11 Commission: multiple members have admitted to using marijuana
NIST: multiple members have admitted to using marijuana
Popular Mechanics: multiple members have admitted to using marijuana

See? It's the fucking wacky weed. It's reefer madness, bro.

[Lazortag]

Edit: Sorry, the first part is supposed to say:

[Giegue] I just had tandoori chicken and nachos
[Wehrmacht] I'm raping noobs in the bin laden thread

This was from the #p99 IRC channel where wehrmacht was bragging about this thread, and I was bragging about my lunch, but the forums don't register "<" ">" tags very well.

[Turtles]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And guess what, here's an MIT engineer Jeff King saying the exact opposite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCLHL5iToJ8

By the way, I just re-read and felt the need to comment on this. Jeff King is not an "MIT engineer". He's a family physician that graduated from MIT 35+ years ago. Thomas Eagar graduated with an S.B. and a Sc.D from MIT. He's served as a professor and department head at MIT for decades. He's worked on the National Research Council and done research for the US Congress and US Department of Energy. He's taught a dozen graduate and professional level engineering courses. He's one of the most accomplished engineers in the world.

It's not point and counterpoint. It's like quoting J. Scott Armstrong (from Wharton) on a business proposal, then countering by quoting a guy that graduated from Wharton in the '70s and has been working as a police officer ever since.