![]() |
|
#16
|
||||||
|
I would like to necro this post with some additional evidence. I see nilbog had previously put his foot down here:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...94&postcount=7 Quote:
I found a post that is dated 9/23/2000 which talks about burnout buff messages wearing off: https://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthre...&t=5655&page=2 Quote:
I'm sure I can google harder for more information if need be. I did find a reference in mcoy's log which is at the very least in the Luclin era if we want to try and narrow the window down: Quote:
Let me know if more information is needed in this regard or if pet wear off messages are just something you aren't interested in implementing (I wouldn't want to waste my time searching if it was ultimately voted down). Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what a 'beneficial' spell is... Burnout is definitely a buff, but I think originally it like self destructed your pet so may have been flagged differently? The invis message is hard to argue though. #ClassicP99
__________________
Wedar - Level 60 Grandmaster (Retired)
| |||||
|
|