P99 Enchanter Strike

[Ruinous]

Originally Posted by Throb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ponied up? There is no denying an army of charmed pets was way overpowered. Honestly, I think people are misremembering a lot of things regarding classic charm. Lots of enchanters didn't even use it, epsecially on raids. Hell, most necromancers and mages weren't allowed to use pets on raids. People were so completely illogical and unreasonable regarding any pets whatsoever on raids, and that continued well into Luclin and maybe beyond. It only takes a few idiots that can't control their shit to make people flip the fuck out and say enough is enough, no more pets.

However, the enchanters I knew that were good at it and knew their shit, were literally gods in classic. I don't know about your server, but on mine the first classes to solo lower guk (king and ghoul lord) in classic were enchanters and necromancers because of charm. In exp groups with a shaman and enc, the exp flowed even well into POP, until they nerfed it.

Making enchanters take it up the ass like this (and that IS what you're doing) is NOT classic. If you want to nerf charm fine, but let's be reasonable about it.... even if it does not fall in line with classic, someone needs to look at the resist checks and tell me it's not completely fucked up. There is a middle ground here that will let enchanters have some of their deserved power and appease the haters at the same time. Let's get there.

Thanks.

An army? How about one enchanter, with one charmed Cleric in hate making or breaking a KS group? Literally doing more DPS than any other group filled with DPS classes. Doesn't take an army, pal.

I don't know how many times it needs to be engraved into your thick skull to realize Enchanters were a utility class. Not a DPS class. The truth of the matter is that the Dev's do their best to recreate a classic experience. This isn't some personal vendetta against your class. They are simply doing what they believe is truthful to classic (which many people, aside from the squeaky wheels complaining, will attest to). If you want to disprove them, work less with "OMG CHARM BROKED AFTER 1.32 SEC AND THE MOB TOUCHED ME IN THE NAUGHTY PLACE" and work more with solid evidence to disprove that the system is currently incorrect.

If you chose to play the class simply for Charming alone, you chose the wrong reasons. Ya'll are bitching quite a bit about the game not being easy any more for you. You came here knowing full well that classic EQ was not, which separated it out from the rest of the MMO's that followed.

[Throb]

Originally Posted by Ruinous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

An army? How about one enchanter, with one charmed Cleric in hate making or breaking a KS group? Literally doing more DPS than any other group filled with DPS classes. Doesn't take an army, pal.

I'm not your pal, buddy.

I don't know what kind of brokedick shitbirds you grouped with in hate, but a charmed cleric didn't make or break getting the exp in any groups I was in. Generally the melees/rogues group stole all the exp.

work more with solid evidence to disprove that the system is currently incorrect.

As it's been stated these changes are being made with little or purely anecdotal evidence. A dev finding some retards hyperbole on allakhazam is not proof of anything, yet alone proof that a nerf was justified. But here we are.

So the burden of proof is now on us? Where is the 'evidence' that this is how classic was? That's right, there is none.

[falkun]

Originally Posted by Throb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the burden of proof is now on us? Where is the 'evidence' that this is how classic was? That's right, there is none.

The burden of proof is ABSOLUTELY on you. The devs do their work (for free mind you), if you don't like it, either pony up the proof yourself, or leave the server. Otherwise, get off your soap box.

[Ruinous]

Originally Posted by Throb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the burden of proof is now on us? Where is the 'evidence' that this is how classic was? That's right, there is none.

Grats, it's not your fucking server. So yes, the burden IS on you cuntrag.

[redghosthunter]

Lets stay on topic... Enough of the personal attacks.

Find the proof.... its out there somewhere. All ive found so far from

HATE is Correct now on P1999... I guess playing a ENC when server first started was ... the golden age [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Hate gets Reduced- AFTER SoV . Notice the comment about ENCs..... Near to instant death .. from hate.

Faction --- Staff +1

------------------------------
January 9, 2001 3:00 am
------------------------------

*NPC AI - Hate*

We've made a number of changes to NPC AI, specifically to the section
dealing with target-selection, or what's commonly referred to as
"Hate". It is not so much that NPCs react differently to hate now than
before, but that we've changed the way that hate is awarded.

--- We reduced the amount of hate that can be caused by a proc. Due to
the high proc rates at upper levels, the amount of hate generated from
procs, and the spells that were selected for those procs, made keeping
the attention of the creature much too easy a task for the tank.
Simply, it nearly eliminated the challenge of keeping a foes attention
at levels above 50.

--- We've capped the amount of hate that can be awarded to most
casters, specifically for debuff-type spells like the Malo and Tash
series. The hate calculation for these spells takes into account the
number of hitpoints of the NPC and did not "play nice" with the
increased HP limit of Velious. It explains why Enchanters, for
instance, would complain that casting a Tash spell would lead to NEAR-INSTANT DEATH