Bin Laden's dead

[Doors]

Terrible. I found you instantly after opening my pvp skill.

[wehrmacht]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ennoia]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only if PvP stand for Planes vs People

[mitic]

WTC = 3000 civilian casualties = osama = mass murder

irak = 100000 civilian casualties = usa = ?

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WTC = 3000 civilian casualties = osama = mass murder

irak = 100000 civilian casualties = usa = ?

1) There's no 'K' in Iraq.

2) The vast, vast majority of those "100,000 civilian casualties" were not caused by US or Coalition forces, but by other Iraqis. Also: the word you're looking for is fatalities, not casualties. Casualty refers to both deaths and injuries; fatality refers to deaths.

3) Go suck a fat dick if you feel the need to defend a mass murderer.

[Ennoia]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3) Go suck a fat dick if you feel the need to defend a mass murderer.

If our troops aren't pulled back home immediately, you're doing the same fucking thing.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Ennoia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If our troops aren't pulled back home immediately, you're doing the same fucking thing.

LOL -- right. Because we had ~150,000 troops in Afghanistan and Iraq to ensure Osama's death (in Pakistan). Now that mission's accomplished, guess we might as well pack up and leave.

We're in the process of assuming control and ensuring the stability of a region stockpiled with the most valuable, dwindling resource on Earth. Turning Osama into a bloody, lifeless corpse was bonus points, not game over.

And enough with the guilt trip over collateral f*cking damage. US forces are responsible for the deaths of significantly more combatants than civilians in both Iraq and Afghanistan. If the US wanted to murder civilians, they'd all be dead.

[Murphy]

the US definitely doesn't want to murder a future labor resource.

[mitic]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WTC = 3000 civilian casualties = osama = mass murder

irak = 100000 civilian casualties = usa = ?

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) There's no 'K' in Iraq.

2) The vast, vast majority of those "100,000 civilian casualties" were not caused by US or Coalition forces, but by other Iraqis. Also: the word you're looking for is fatalities, not casualties. Casualty refers to both deaths and injuries; fatality refers to deaths.

3) Go suck a fat dick if you feel the need to defend a mass murderer.

looks like ive hit a nerve eh? just keep on slant drilling... oh wait, there is no need for that anymore since iraQ is occupied now

[Morlaeth]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WTC = 3000 civilian casualties = osama = mass murder

irak = 100000 civilian casualties = usa = ?

He killed many more than his victims in the WTC attack.