Being a bard

[Lonedrahon25]

So your bone is just that i can put a pet on attack, go run and take a piss, then come back and hope to god that i remembered to flush because im worried about needing to make sure my pet is healed before he gets killed? Do you understand that a mage without a pet is worse off then say a wizard? Mages backbone is the pet, its main focus is on the pet for a reason...Without it, u might as well roll a wizzy for better nukes...

[Trimm]

Originally Posted by Lonedrahon25 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So your bone is just that i can put a pet on attack, go run and take a piss, then come back and hope to god that i remembered to flush because im worried about needing to make sure my pet is healed before he gets killed? Do you understand that a mage without a pet is worse off then say a wizard? Mages backbone is the pet, its main focus is on the pet for a reason...Without it, u might as well roll a wizzy for better nukes...

I don't think anyone is arguing this. A Mage without a pet should be worst than a Wizard, correct. A Mage's bread and butter is his pet, correct. A Mage can do things a Wiz can't, and vise veras. That's how the game was designed.

What got some people ranting was the statement 'bards along with mages are broken'. This thread was about Bard issues and was derailed in the first post.