Are these ZEMs accurate?

[quellren]

So now can people finally see that Lake of Ill Omen is actually 60/75 or 80% exp and stop wasting time there?

Seriously the worst leveling zone in EQ.

[Messianic]

Originally Posted by quellren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So now can people finally see that Lake of Ill Omen is actually 60/75 or 80% exp and stop wasting time there?

Seriously the worst leveling zone in EQ.

It's not the worst leveling zone strictly because it had (has?) a negative ZEM. I don't think leveling my monk from 22-30 there in ~10 hours, solo, was some kind of waste of time or inefficient.

It's very safe, easy, and the mobs are adequately spread out yet adequately close to one another. It's also right next to FV. There isn't a comparable outdoor zone for 20s - SK is absolute garbage compared to LOIO because the mobs are far too spread out or erratic in level - you might get an egret or you might get an avocet at the only decent place in the zone for non-bards/kiting classes - KFC. Plus the nearest bind point is much farther away than LoIO.

[azeth]

Originally Posted by quellren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So now can people finally see that Lake of Ill Omen is actually 60/75 or 80% exp and stop wasting time there?

Seriously the worst leveling zone in EQ.

zem wise, but consider how many simple trash mobs roam in and out of the sarnak fort.

[redghosthunter]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

zem wise, but consider how many simple trash mobs roam in and out of the sarnak fort.

Ya its kinda like killing Crocs in Oasis... If ya can stack em the exp will be flying.