I invite anyone to have a regular discussion about guns, feel free to ask anything

[mickmoranis]

this is going to be very interesting wow, so al sharptons brother was involved in a shooting just hours after he was at an anti gun march.

Kenneth Glasgow(Sharptons brother) was driving a car where the passenger shot someone.

Now here's the rub: Dothan Police Chief Steve Parrish said that Glasgow and Townes allegedly searched for Jennings, who they believe had stolen Townes’ car. When they found her, Townes allegedly shot Jennings as she drove, hitting her in the head. She died later.

“Instead of him notifying law enforcement, he took matter in his own hands and jumped in Mr. Glasgow’s vehicle to find Breunia Jennings,” said Parrish, according to a report in the Dothan Eagle.

So.. what do we do here? We have someone who says we have to get rid of guns, who goes out on his own instead of calling the police, to solve a crime, and ends up being a good guy with a gun shooting a bad guy with a gun...

But, wait, is there more? Why is he being charged? Is there perhaps stricter gun laws in the state he is in? Idk, but it is a strange situation! Anti gun, uses gun for the thing second amendment supporters say guns are for... confusing!

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018...nti-gun-march/

[katrik]

Originally Posted by eadric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

zero chance katrik actually owns a firearm of any kind.

Lol you want proof? I was raised in the South homie.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it says it dead to rights in the dickey amendment that they can study gun violence.

Nowhere in your quote does it say they could not study gun violence. Not anywhere in any link or quote that you have given me does it say that. Anywhere.

Now if you were a little more edcuated on how spending bills work especially 3,000 page ones, there are all kinds of stupid sentences in there that mean nothing, like "now they can study gun violence" even though, nowhere did it say they could not. Politicians put words in there like that, to confuse people like you.

Honestly its why libertarians are great, they want to get rid of ALL that bullshit that just confuses people like ya.

"While the amendment itself remains, the language in a report accompanying the Omnibus spending bill clarifies that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention can, in fact, conduct research into gun violence."

thats from your quote, what it means is it just re-iterates what I have been saying, THEY ARE ALLOWED TO, they were ALWAYS allowed to, nowhere did it say they couldnt... this is just a reminder/wording to confuse you.

notice it doesnt say "changes" it says "clarifies" which means it basically is a reminder.

if it was already the case, why bother clarifying? you're dumb.

Honestly its why libertarians are great, they want to get rid of ALL that bullshit that just confuses people like ya.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_YgD-nL3xc

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if it was already the case, why bother clarifying? you're dumb.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_YgD-nL3xc

i told you why bother clarifying in the post you quoted its to manipulate you. but could you explain to me how im supposed to make the leap in logic that you actually think clarification means changing something? your troll is as deep as innothule swamp, meaning not very. work on it.

[Wonkie]

okay you're saying the trump appointed HHS secretary validated obama's statement to manipulate me

what?

[mickmoranis]

No you’re saying that I don’t know what the fuck that means.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

okay you're saying the trump appointed HHS secretary validated obama's statement to manipulate me

what?

An HHS hottie (u might know of her existence if u follow HHS lobbyists n speakers n such) followed me on IG then waited 2-3 days to watch which pictures I like on my history of activity

And subsequently unfollowed me.

I didn't follow her back because I knew I'd slip up and like a bunch of soft porn and lewd images. I mean there's 24 hours in a day and IG is basically built to serve soft porn up.

Had this happen several times. Once with a popular curve model who went back and actually unliked all my pictures I guess thinking she has to erase her like of me for some moral reason....

Tldr; I got clout but these girls treat this app like its fucking Tinder or more accurately like its a OKcupid speed dating app...

Huge disconnect. What do??

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No you’re saying that I don’t know what the fuck that means.

honestly yes. i don't believe you have the cognitive capacity to reconcile your beliefs with material reality.

it brings me no pleasure to say this

[AzzarTheGod]

Like if we aren't even on speaking terms why am I being objectified and treated like I need to adhere to "dating criteria" in order to maintain any follows from women other than porn stars and thots.

Seems to be a huge double standard. Or some kind of gender related disconnect.

This might be over you guys heads.

You can go back to taking turns sucking off David hogg if u can't handle it.

[mickmoranis]

Go on