Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2011, 11:30 AM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
that graph is way to mathematically complex..

also, root and snare should be removed from the game (this includes necro/sk darkness) imo
Yea... and so should warriors ability to dual wield...
  #2  
Old 04-16-2011, 11:42 AM
wehrmacht wehrmacht is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SullonZek
Posts: 532
Send a message via AIM to wehrmacht
Default

If anybody wants to whine and claim this is a bad system, go ahead and post your own and we'll see if it looks any better. With the one I posted, a warrior walking around unbuffed with 120 fire resist (which is a shit ton for kunark, probably would need the best warrior usable items in the game in every slot) would resist a wizard draught 45% of the time. If he had malo cast on him, he would resist draughts 0% of the time.

If the warrior was buffed with 55 fire resist buff from a druid to reach 175 fire resist, the wizard would have to use lures. If he had malo or mala cast on him while that druid resist buff was up, his resist would go from 175 to 75 due to changes in malo/mala listed in the first post.


- Malo, Mala & Tash - while debuffed by either of these spell lines, they do their normal debuff value as well as nullifying the effects of any cold, fire, magic, and poison resist buffs you have up until it wears off. This would affect bards too, so no more invincible training machines.


I think people are going to have a hard time trying to claim this system is anywhere close to being unfair to casters. It can be adjusted again once Velious is released if necessary.
Last edited by wehrmacht; 04-16-2011 at 12:33 PM..
  #3  
Old 04-16-2011, 11:45 AM
Misto Misto is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody wants to whine and claim this is a bad system, go ahead and post your own and we'll see if it looks any better.
no1's whining about ur post dumbass.

we just said nice graph.
  #4  
Old 04-16-2011, 12:19 PM
Sniperfire Sniperfire is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody wants to whine and claim this is a bad system, go ahead and post your own and we'll see if it looks any better. With the one I posted, a warrior walking around unbuffed with 120 fire resist (which is a shit ton for kunark, probably would need the best warrior usable items in the game in every slot) would resist a wizard draught 45% of the time. If he had malo cast on him, he would resist draughts 0% of the time.

If the warrior was buffed with 55 fire resist buff from a druid to reach 175 fire resist, the wizard would have to use lures. If he had malo or mala cast on him while that druid resist buff was up, his resist would go from 175 to 75 due to changes in malo/mala listed in the first post.


- Malo & Mala - while debuffed by either of these spell lines, they do their normal debuff value as well as nullifying the effects of any cold, fire, magic, and poison resist buffs you have up until it wears off. This would affect bards too, so no more invincible training machines.


I think people are going to have a hard time trying to claim this system is anywhere close to being unfair to casters. It can be adjusted again once Velious is released if necessary.
120 fire is easily attainable in kunark.....also dont change the game making stuns shorter negates there use dont try to rewrite eq just balance it

shawl of protection and start resists and your 1/2 way to 120 with one item on... caster stun durations are important for them to operate properly

i went back and read this again and its very clear to me your an idiot...this is the biggest pile of shit ever to be called a post imo
Last edited by Sniperfire; 04-16-2011 at 12:26 PM..
  #5  
Old 04-16-2011, 12:37 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bombfist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 10-15-2012, 02:58 PM
Slave Slave is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody wants to whine and claim this is a bad system, go ahead and
Pay attention, everyone! There is intelligence and there is social intelligence.

Wehrmacht's OP was extremely well-thought out. It was extremely well written. It had the virtue of being pretty damn fair and accurate.

But here,
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody wants to whine and claim this is a bad system,
three posts later, is where he completely throws away any semblance of respect for his listeners, ironically ensuring that none of his ideas will ever come to pass.

If you actually care to present your opinion in a way that can change minds, that is surely a longer process to accomplish, but in any case here is one example of how to easily destroy everything you work for. By being a fucking douchebag.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If anybody wants to whine
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.