Vintage toys you had as a kid

[loramin]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

oh

my

god

the expectations of a male are EXACTLY the same as a female

get a grip.

Mick I know you live in your own little world, but try sticking your head out in to the real world once in awhile. Just as a for instance, there is no "slut shaming" of men, in the real world.

(P.S. Please don't link me to a story about something like a guy that slept with a bunch of women, gave them AIDs, and is now being "slut shamed" ... or anything else dumb like that.)

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mick I know you live in your own little world, but try sticking your head out in to the real world once in awhile. Just as a for instance, there is no "slut shaming" of men, in the real world.

(P.S. Please don't link me to a story about something like a guy that slept with a bunch of women, gave them AIDs, and is now being "slut shamed" ... or anything else dumb like that.)

that's because the cost of sexual activity is infinitely less for men than it is for women, so society didn't need to develop a mechanism of restraint for men in that regard. Instead, we shame men who do not provide for their children and children's mothers ^^

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mick I know you live in your own little world, but try sticking your head out in to the real world once in awhile. Just as a for instance, there is no "slut shaming" of men, in the real world.

(P.S. Please don't link me to a story about something like a guy that slept with a bunch of women, gave them AIDs, and is now being "slut shamed" ... or anything else dumb like that.)

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that's because the cost of sexual activity is infinitely less for men than it is for women, so society didn't need to develop a mechanism of restraint for men in that regard. Instead, we shame men who do not provide for their children and children's mothers ^^

lol what a three pointer from MM

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that's because the cost of sexual activity is infinitely less for men than it is for women, so society didn't need to develop a mechanism of restraint for men in that regard. Instead, we shame men who do not provide for their children and children's mothers ^^

This was a great counter admittedly lol.

You fighting Mick's fights though I wanted to see what Mick would say! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[loramin]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that's because the cost of sexual activity is infinitely less for men than it is for women, so society didn't need to develop a mechanism of restraint for men in that regard. Instead, we shame men who do not provide for their children and children's mothers ^^

Eating pork today has a risk infinitely less than it did back in biblical days, but back then Jewish and Muslim societies developed a mechanism to restrain the eating of pork because it was dangerous. That's not an issue in modern times thanks to better food safety measures, so there's nothing wrong with eating pork now. The only people who still don't eat pork are "holdovers" who still follow the old rules even though they don't make sense anymore (ie. conservative Jewish and Muslim faiths).

Same thing with slut shaming: we have birth control now so there's no need for society to control women's fertility, they can control it quite fine themselves. But we still have slut shaming, because of people whose beliefs are "holdovers" from before birth control. And, unsurprisingly, conservative religions tend to be holdovers when it comes to slut shaming too, almost as if conservative religion by its nature is a force against progress ...

So which side are you on, the conservative forces holding back progress, or people who believe in treating women like equals in a modern society?

P.S. We do not shame men who fail to take care of their mothers/partners in anywhere near the same way we slut shame. Slut shaming is a pervasive practice which impacts all women in our society. It affects not just who women get to sleep with, but what they wear, who they associate with, etc. Shaming men for not being good providers has no equivalent societal pressure because it's a tiny force by comparison.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mick I know you live in your own little world, but try sticking your head out in to the real world once in awhile. Just as a for instance, there is no "slut shaming" of men, in the real world.

(P.S. Please don't link me to a story about something like a guy that slept with a bunch of women, gave them AIDs, and is now being "slut shamed" ... or anything else dumb like that.)

lol shutup you tiny beta male

oh are you upset, shutup and internalize it, its totally unatractive

"im a feminist you should message me if: youre tall and a gentleman"

get real kid women have nothing harder than men and its all fake and women are manipulating you.

ur the kinda guy that pees sitting down cus ur girl asked u to.

suicide rate in males is > female.. and ur gonna try to convince me that girls have it harder?

lol go work in an industrial site.

Funfact: women stayed home and cooked becuase males sacraficed their health and saftey by working dangerous jobs.

they were thankfull

then ur cuck nation post modern pampered life hid that reality from you and now you think it was some conspiracy by males to cage their wives and make them slaves called the patriarchy

who made up that narritive?

Fat lesbians in the 1900's

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Eating pork today has a risk infinitely less than it did back in biblical days, but back then Jewish and Muslim societies developed a mechanism to restrain the eating of pork because it was dangerous. That's not an issue in modern times thanks to better food safety measures, so there's nothing wrong with eating pork now. The only people who still don't eat pork are "holdovers" who still follow the old rules even though they don't make sense anymore (ie. conservative Jewish and Muslim faiths).

tell that to the poppy picker in afghanistan who's only guard against a miserable existence infested with flesh eating worms is his shithead god. it's not his fault pigs will eat pretty much anything including carrion and the idiocy or his forebears has failed to produce an environment capable of effectively mitigating associated dangers. he could still safely it it, he just doesn't know how.

see in the developed world, we know how, but more importantly, most of us don't need to because of compulsive safe farming and food handling practices instituted by our benevolent overlords ^^

Same thing with slut shaming: we have birth control now so there's no need for society to control women's fertility, they can control it quite fine themselves. But we still have slut shaming, because of people whose beliefs are "holdovers" from before birth control. And, unsurprisingly, conservative religions tend to be holdovers when it comes to slut shaming too, almost as if conservative religion by its nature is a force against progress ...

no, it's not the same thing unfortunately ^^. yes, contraceptives are available and when used directed, birth control is highly effective. however, a 40% share of child births being claimed by single mothers indicates many women are no more capable of responsible use than they are of choosing dependable mates.

So which side are you on, the conservative forces holding back progress, or people who believe in treating women like equals in a modern society?

im on the largely vacant side of reason. i don't care whether it is accomplished by shame or law, so long as we do not continue subjecting women and children to undue hardships simply because some men want better access to sex. if we are not going to deter destructive behavior with shame, then it is morally incumbent upon us to safeguard against it with legislation. conditionally sterilize all persons at birth and then license parenting. then people, their families and society are free of the risks of unplanned pregnancy and the lineages of suffering so often spawned from them.

P.S. We do not shame men who fail to take care of their mothers/partners in anywhere near the same way we slut shame. Slut shaming is a pervasive practice which impacts all women in our society. It affects not just who women get to sleep with, but what they wear, who they associate with, etc. Shaming men for not being good providers has no equivalent societal pressure because it's a tiny force by comparison.

and god hates hamburgers. any counterclaim is as valid as the claim itself.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by NecroP99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cool story to post in a VINTAGE TOYS THREAD

The irony is the vintage toy generation had their lives pampered so much (you’re a pre-mellenial, mellenial) and that’s why you lost touch with reality, grew up and became adult children who don’t know how to politics and that’s why your country and lives are so fucked up and you’re manipulated into thinking #weNeedFeminism

[loramin]

Originally Posted by NecroP99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Finding it incredibly hard to follow your disjointed thought process

Trust me, you're not the only one.

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trust me, you're not the only one.

Here let me put it into perspective: your opinions are as stupid as mine, however I’m not trying to change the social hiarchy of the world, however you want to take your stupid ideas and impose them on others.

Mine are directly related to and exist solely to remind you that your ideas are stupid.

If you have a hard time following mine, that means that you are simply not realizing that mine are a metaphor for yours and that your ideas are the ones that are stupid and hard to follow.