Why Liberalism is a mental disease

[Toehammer]

Originally Posted by Potus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No but you see, someone discovered the Photon and called it a Photon. Before that, no one would have called something a Photon, the same way no one would have called Thomas Paine a Socialist before the idea had even been published and the term "Socialist" coined.

You should watch Back to the Future, it's got very few black people in it and it explains the whole "TIME" thing. It's very simple, I'm sure you'll grasp it after repeated viewings.

Also, nobody discovered the photon, it was predicted (Newton got the word out, Fresnel/Huygens owned him) then Planck brought it back full circle predicting light as a particle. In physics, discoveries are made in the lab, but things like the photon, or any other construct of the mind, are not discovered but merely revealed by experiment. Experiment drives construction of a theory, that is why the Stern-Gerlach experiment revealed quantum mechanics' beauty. Only when the experimentalists and theorists have close discourse can progress be made.

This lack of communication and common sense between socialists is astounding. Unfortunately, socialism (a beautiful construct of the mind) has been revealed to fail, experimentally. Thus it only works in the confines of a cranial ivory tower. Interestingly, the socialist's skull is their ivory tower (ivory prison), for they have never ventured into the real world to see that their crackpot theories fail.

You and OP need to stop using something as beautiful as the photon to discuss socialism/(current trend of US liberalism). GTFO! You demean science in doing so.

Also, offhandedly insulting Back to the Future is reprehensible. That movie is fantastic. Only newbs say otherwise.

/trying to derail thread

[Potus]

Originally Posted by Toehammer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You and OP need to stop using something as beautiful as the photon to discuss socialism/(current trend of US liberalism). GTFO! You demean science in doing so.

/trying to derail thread

Scientists are part of the liberal ivory tower. And Gilbert Lewis coined the term Photon.

Out as well. *points*

[Toehammer]

Originally Posted by Potus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Scientists are part of the liberal ivory tower. And Gilbert Lewis coined the term Photon.

Out as well. *points*

I promised I was done with this thread, but now I am not. I DON'T CARE who coined a fucking term. You obviously study a social or soft science, because you have zero argument/logic skills. Or else you are just inept.

Gilbert Lewis, great man, I love the Lewis dot structure; it's great for a physicist to understand chemical bonding on paper. But seriously, thanks for going to wikipedia as the shaky base of your logic-fail pyramid. Maxwell didn't call his equations "Maxwell's Equations", so does that mean that someone else gets street cred for naming them?

Sure scientists are part of the liberal ivory tower, what is your point? That doesn't mean that they all buy into the bullshit. Nor am I naive to believe all poly sci types are liberals. I am still searching for something of your comment that could resemble a central argument.

How does your foot taste?

You sound like a pansy that flexes your e-muscle by saying, "Out as well. *points*". You lack cajones, too much philosophizing... just remember Be a philosopher; but, amidst all your philosophy, be still a man. - Hume

Potus auctions, "WTB philosophy weiner"

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Toehammer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I promised I was done with this thread, but now I am not. I DON'T CARE who coined a fucking term. You obviously study a social or soft science, because you have zero argument/logic skills. Or else you are just inept.

That's the exact same thing all my posts said to Potus as well. He's unable to address anything in the original post because it appears his entire life is invested in that ideology. He starts to read it and notices the subconscious reason for all of his actions are derived from feelings of inferiority. He has no rational argument against that so tries to drag you into a semantics debate. If that fails, he then tries to drag you into a morality debate to try and claim he is the moral high ground and "you are evil".

Same way with this Rilkean "girl/man/creature". Look what she sent to me earlier:

Originally Posted by Rilkean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How many good looking women have been president of the USA? How many senators are good looking women? How many heads of state are good looking women? How many bankers are good looking women? My god. The number 0 keeps coming up.

She see's the nonsense on TV saying everyone on earth is identical and equal, notices women hold less positions of power in society, assumes men are in those positions not because they were qualified for them, but it just has to be some other reason because otherwise she wouldn't be equal.

So now she has an inferiority complex and tries to solve it by attempting to remove those people from their positions regardless of whether they were the most fit for them or not.

This is how all liberal ideology works, it's the beta males, minorities, women, gays, basically everyone with an inferiority complex banding together against the people most fit to hold that spot. You don't have to be inferior if you can just kill the person doing better than you!

The same type of people notice women make up only 11% of engineers. Even though there's nothing from preventing women from choosing that field in college, it couldn't possibly be their sex just has no interest in that field compared to men, otherwise they wouldn't be equal. They have to solve that inferiority complex somehow.

This is where it really gets interesting. Practically everything about psychology is already known. You can easily predict how these angry, little, inferiority complex people will react to any given variable presented to them. Bankers will move in and try to sell full blown socialism and communism as a solution to these people's problems and they love it. Not because it's good, just because it erases the people that give them their inferiority complex. Why would the bankers want this? To centralize all the wealth and power, then they can easily steal everything.

Isn't it awesome how people's pathetic psychological problems are used to destroy them while at the same time thinking they are getting something great?

[Japan]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Practically everything about psychology is already known.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As in predicting human behavior (game theory), not neuroscience and where consciousness comes from and how to build technological singularity AI robots and whatever other nonsense you're thinking of. It's pretty easy to predict mob behavior based on what variables you feed them.

[Massive Marc]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The same type of people notice women make up only 11% of engineers. Even though there's nothing from preventing women from choosing that field in college, it couldn't possibly be their sex just has no interest in that field compared to men, otherwise they wouldn't be equal. They have to solve that inferiority complex somehow.

I'm not sure if it's a inferiority complex, but as I get older I notice this type of behavior a lot more. The whole Equal Rights movement fucked everything up..

Everyone IS NOT equal.