Sky - Overseer of Air

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Sadiki [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's adorable, he thinks his posts have substance.

Don't let your personal attacks distract you from the fact that AG and Rustle disrupted casual guilds raiding sky, so the casual guilds killed OoAs. I like it. I hope they keep doing it as long as Velious-class raiding guilds act like there's no repercussions for their actions.

[pogs4ever]

Your day, your noble.

+1 for that

[Expediency]

Originally Posted by pogs4ever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your day, your noble.

+1 for that

This would result in highest total of nobles with least possible hassle.

[Sadiki]

Originally Posted by pogs4ever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your day, your noble.

+1 for that

If we're leaving OOAs up for more Nobles, then this honestly makes the most sense. There's no reason to stop people from killing OOAs if they also can't just kill a Noble if it pops while they are there.

Originally Posted by RedXIII [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Casuals been toxic?! i am shocked...

There is very little toxicity - just because a troll has half the posts in the thread doesn't mean he's telling the truth.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Sadiki [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

doesn't mean he's telling the truth.

I think you and I clearly have different definitions of what the word "truth" means. To me, it's a factual representation of events. To you, it seems to be believing whatever Expediency tells you to believe.

Examples of truth:

1) Azure Guard ported up to sky one day last month on a night that was not their designated sky day and began clearing island 1. When the guilds committed to that sky day started porting up, AG got caught with their pants down and had to cancel their plans to kill princess.

2) On 5/6/2017, Rustle ported up to sky with the intent on either socking noble or killing Gwan on a night reserved by other guilds. They cleared island 1 before anybody else came up and got caught corpsing keys back on 1 after they were finished.

Can you please let us know exactly what Expediency told you to believe about #1?

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think you and I clearly have different definitions of what the word "truth" means. To me, it's a factual representation of events. To you, it seems to be believing whatever Expediency tells you to believe.

Examples of truth:

1) Azure Guard ported up to sky one day last month on a night that was not their designated sky day and began clearing island 1. When the guilds committed to that sky day started porting up, AG got caught with their pants down and had to cancel their plans to kill princess.

2) On 5/6/2017, Rustle ported up to sky with the intent on either socking noble or killing Gwan on a night reserved by other guilds. They cleared island 1 before anybody else came up and got caught corpsing keys back on 1 after they were finished.

Can you please let us know exactly what Expediency told you to believe about #1?

Have you got your date right for the rustle event? I remember being in sky on 7th of March.

I watched Rustle fail to pull Noble to isle 1 (leashing was new). Weezard asked if I knew when the AG raid started, I replied in about 4 hours; 2 hours less than the 6 hour respawn timer of the princess. I advised they purchase isle 1.5 keys. Weezard disagreed, claiming princess was on a 3 hour timer.

If you were inclined you could blame AG for letting Rustle screw them; AG knew Noble was due, had the capacity to port up and had the keys corpsed to move straight to 1.5. If they took this action isle 1 would never have been killed. But I guess that is 'victim blaming'.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have you got your date right for the rustle event? I remember being in sky on 7th of March.

I watched Rustle fail to pull Noble to isle 1 (leashing was new). Weezard asked if I knew when the AG raid started, I replied in about 4 hours; 2 hours less than the 6 hour respawn timer of the princess. I advised they purchase isle 1.5 keys. Weezard disagreed, claiming princess was on a 3 hour timer.

It actually sounds like you're saying Rustle has done this more than once.

[Maner]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have you got your date right for the rustle event? I remember being in sky on 7th of March.

I watched Rustle fail to pull Noble to isle 1 (leashing was new). Weezard asked if I knew when the AG raid started, I replied in about 4 hours; 2 hours less than the 6 hour respawn timer of the princess. I advised they purchase isle 1.5 keys. Weezard disagreed, claiming princess was on a 3 hour timer.

If you were inclined you could blame AG for letting Rustle screw them; AG knew Noble was due, had the capacity to port up and had the keys corpsed to move straight to 1.5. If they took this action isle 1 would never have been killed. But I guess that is 'victim blaming'.

Lmfao ya, AG could have rescheduled their raid for earlier. But how were they supposed to know people in rustle were going to show up and kill their island one? It is victim blaming and another example of your idiocy.