Austria, WTF?

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, I know about the frog, never tried it though, other than fried with butter. They can't jump from that predicament.

The thing is, the Muslims loved Hitler. And if they by chance have some of his DNA, you know they will clone him back. So my analogy may be truer than anyone imagines if at some point a cloned Hitler, and along with the Muslims who love him, that they rule over Austria one day, one day soon. Someone like Hitler will anyway, that's a given with moving in this direction, and this is just another step in preparing for it, as their elite ruling class would rejoice at his coming.

There's actually an interesting point buried in here about how Muslim-dominated countries traditionally didn't see any daylight between Axis and Allies. Eventually many of them sided with Hitler. Today -- because of the issues with Israel -- many uneducated middle eastern peoples readily believe the Holocaust was made up.

That being said. The truth is there is an old cultural war between Muslims and Christians. Just like there is with Protestants and Catholics and Eastern Orthodox. All these Religions promote the idea that they alone will take over the world as the far majority religion. This often has sparked violence. The Crusades were about Catholics and Eastern Orthodox just as much as Muslims. Some argue that "war on terror" is just a modern Christian (coalition) crusade.

Even Buddhism is associated with lots of violence when their majority status is called into question. See Burma.

[Nilstoniakrath]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some argue that "war on terror" is just a modern Christian (coalition) crusade.

Finally some one else realizes that 9/11, and all the bombings and beheadings are all part of a Christian conspiracy for world domination. Alla Akbar that, you fools

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Nilstoniakrath [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Finally some one else realizes that 9/11, and all the bombings and beheadings are all part of a Christian conspiracy for world domination. Alla Akbar that, you fools

PNAC was highly influential in GWB Admin.

who do you think told him to knock down the towers?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

PNAC was highly influential in GWB Admin.

who do you think told him to knock down the towers?

When did you start believing that?!? .... O.o
So you take back the comments against tower #7? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
WIN WIN I SO WIN!! Wooooooo! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

PNAC was a neocon globalist entity, for a while, doing no different than any other globalists including nation building in the middle-east. Nation building, the defeat that was thrusted into an already established victory.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Nilstoniakrath [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Finally some one else realizes that 9/11, and all the bombings and beheadings are all part of a Christian conspiracy for world domination. Alla Akbar that, you fools

The Pretext of the Crusades were to

1) Gain back Christian territory

2) Defend Christians

3) Purify Christian lands

A lot of: "Oh no! Christians are under attack!" medieval arguments were used to justify war. Then the knights would come in and take over large swaths of land to "protect Christians."

These days -- the argument goes -- Western Democracy ideals have replaced Christian theology. But the same general practice is taking place in the Muslim and Eastern Orthodox world.

Edit: an important thing is understand is that religions used to be in charge of matters of state or shared power with military leaders (kings). So religion used to be the primary cohesion. Rather than Nationalism or Democratic Idealism.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Pretext of the Crusades were to

1) Gain back Christian territory

2) Defend Christians

3) Purify Christian lands

A lot of: "Oh no! Christians are under attack!" medieval arguments were used to justify war. Then the knights would come in and take over large swaths of land to "protect Christians."

These days -- the argument goes -- Western Democracy ideals have replaced Christian theology. But the same general practice is taking place in the Muslim and Eastern Orthodox world.

Typical liberal leftist canned response adopted. Had nutin, nitin! to do with the imperial expansion of Islam including into the 'West. Islam dun did nutin!

But even so, you say "Christian" when that is not correct. These were European Catholics, which in fact don't nor ever did represent the whole of Christianity. In fact more Christians have probably been killed by Catholicism than any other peoples. In fact, the crusades were led by a Viking nation formed in the north of france. Though now embraced Catholicism, but still doing as Vikings do ... since Catholicism had always merged beliefs to a degree. You think you have history down, but that's just too much MTV for ya.

And even since then, Islam has never had a reformation, never an enlightening or any such movement, it just can't. It's not even a real religion at it's core, but purely an ideology. In Catholocism, it came from simply reading the bible again, because they had abandoned it for stuff they just made up. The bible, the NT specifically for the Church, never teaches conquest by the sword, in fact teaches against it. Islam does. So allah axbur mofo!

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Typical liberal leftist canned response adopted. Had nutin, nitin! to do with the imperial expansion of Islam including into the 'West. Islam dun did nutin!

But even so, you say "Christian" when that is not correct. These were European Catholics, which in fact don't nor ever did represent the whole of Christianity. In fact more Christians have probably been killed by Catholicism than any other peoples. In fact, the crusades were led by a Viking nation formed in the north of france. Though now embraced Catholicism, but still doing as Vikings do ... since Catholicism had always merged beliefs to a degree. You think you have history down, but that's just too much MTV for ya.

And even since then, Islam has never had a reformation, never an enlightening or any such movement, it just can't. It's not even a real religion at it's core, but purely an ideology. In Catholocism, it came from simply reading the bible again, because they had abandoned it for stuff they just made up. The bible, the NT specifically for the Church, never teaches conquest by the sword, in fact teaches against it. Islam does. So allah axbur mofo!

Islam has a court system that rules on matters as time changes. What a lot of people don't understand yet, is this court system is opposed to any kind of terrorist activity. So terrorist organizations such as ISIL -- have rejected the modern Islamic court system, and declared they have their own new pure court system. The thing is there is this old Islamic concept called Khawarij that says periodically violent religious radicals will rise up and falsely call themselves Muslim. ISIL basically fits the description.

Most people would consider Catholics "Christians" Daywolf. This is especially true before Martin Luther nailed a sheet of paper with 95 theses on the university's chapel door in October 31, 1517 (the first crusades started by like 1200 A.D.). But I guess you were probably brought up to believe only Protestants are Christians.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Islam has a court system that rules on matters as time changes. What a lot of people don't understand yet, is this court system is opposed to any kind of terrorist activity. So terrorist organizations such as ISIL -- have rejected the modern Islamic court system, and declared they have their own new pure court system. The thing is there is this old Islamic concept called Khawarij that says periodically violent religious radicals will rise up and falsely call themselves Muslim. ISIL basically fits the description.

Most people would consider Catholics "Christians" Daywolf. This is especially true before Martin Luther nailed a sheet of paper with 95 theses on the university's chapel door in October 31, 1517 (the first crusades started by like 1200 A.D.). But I guess you were probably brought up to believe only Protestants are Christians.

historically accurate dunk, very naice!

[Nilstoniakrath]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A lot of: "Oh no! Christians are under attack!" medieval arguments were used to justify war.

Yes, it is really pretty silly to think one is under attack just because your head has been severed from your body. Typical straight white male response is to fight and go to war. One should always rely on negotiation, persuasion, and trying to understand the underlying reasons why those angry with you are upset. And, of course, global warming...