Sitting on the tracks. Awakened strategies.

[Detoxx]

The rule is vague and unfortunately that's very common. Its vague for a reason but I am trying to get with Sirken and the other top guild leaders to try and re hash these rules for some clarity.

As of right now, there is no stipulation to having to re race from the zone in in order to re lock a mob. The only stipulation ever made was a player made agreement that was torched when Awakened got suspended for that Abuse of FTE Vulak. That agreement stated that if Guild A wipes, they must wait for the mob to reset before being able to re lock, any other guild was free to lock it whenever they wanted.

This was to prevent abuse from a guild wiping and the final FTE on them going out and then being able to claim it was a re lock. Unfortunately, as seen here in the rules written in the raid section, the rule is simply this:

[QUOTE=Sirken;2449797]11/17/2016 updated to clarify something that I assumed was common sense:

And if your guild wipes, the target is considered open (not engaged) and can be FTE'd by anyone, and then that guild/raid will have an hour to make an attempt at killing the mob.QUOTE]

[Breaken]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As of right now, there is no stipulation to having to re race from the zone in in order to re lock a mob. The only stipulation ever made was a player made agreement that was torched when Awakened got suspended for that Abuse of FTE Vulak. That agreement stated that if Guild A wipes, they must wait for the mob to reset before being able to re lock, any other guild was free to lock it whenever they wanted.

Funny you mention this. This was never an agreement. You lied to Sirken about it and got us suspended for it. I have provided logs showing we never agreed to it, but unfortunately as we all know, that doesn't do much around here.

The argument is that we used this so called agreement to rule lawyer a Koi Doken into being ours, but that isn't the case. The reason Koi Doken was ours was because CSG got an FTE on it, and conceded it. Our FTE was the next FTE making it the first legitimate FTE. This line of reasoning has *nothing* to do with any so called agreement you argue we agreed to. So, where in this did we use your agreement?

[getsome]

Originally Posted by Breaken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Funny you mention this. This was never an agreement. You lied to Sirken about it and got us suspended for it. I have provided logs showing we never agreed to it, but unfortunately as we all know, that doesn't do much around here

I also never agree to a rules I reference and claim to follow.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I also never agree to a rules I reference and claim to follow.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rekt. Lie more

[Rygar]

Make FTE messages only go out when mob has 5% health drained, then broadcasts top dps as engage. End racing madness.

[Joyelle]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As of right now, there is no stipulation to having to re race from the zone in in order to re lock a mob. The only stipulation ever made was a player made agreement that was torched when Awakened got suspended for that Abuse of FTE Vulak. That agreement stated that if Guild A wipes, they must wait for the mob to reset before being able to re lock, any other guild was free to lock it whenever they wanted.

That agreement was never signed by Awakened. You should not be able to buzz around in someone else's camp (potentially causing harm to that raid like idunno, standing behind a pillar and chain aggroing shit onto the raid below) in order to obtain an FTE as the other guild wipes.

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by Joyelle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That agreement was never signed by Awakened. You should not be able to buzz around in someone else's camp (potentially causing harm to that raid like idunno, standing behind a pillar and chain aggroing shit onto the raid below) in order to obtain an FTE as the other guild wipes.

Lol act like you dont constantly have monks and rogues sitting in our camp every kill. Also, fun fact, we both pull to the zone in. Good luck claiming a zone in as your camp.

That Vyemm you talk about was your terrible monks (Henrique wru?) fucking up the pull, you were about yo train yourselves but decided fuck it, well just train Aftermath and blame them.

Also, it was agreed upon by invoking part of the agreement you wanted then trying to back out when things didnt go your way. Typical Awakened fashion!

How bou da?

[Breaken]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, it was agreed upon by invoking part of the agreement you wanted then trying to back out when things didnt go your way. Typical Awakened fashion!

Please show me where we did this. As I posted above:

The argument is that we used this so called agreement to rule lawyer a Koi Doken into being ours, but that isn't the case. The reason Koi Doken was ours was because CSG got an FTE on it, and conceded it. Our FTE was the next FTE making it the first legitimate FTE. This line of reasoning has *nothing* to do with any so called agreement you argue we agreed to. So, where in this did we use your agreement?

[Joyelle]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How bou da?

You really should stop ending your posts with that...

[dafier]

[QUOTE=Detoxx;2486497]The rule is vagueClassic.

So, what's an SoD?