ninja looting does not mean you make the rules

Gibcarver · #1 03-29-2011, 10:05 AM

no one has ever so blatantly ninjalooted an item I would use before. I am so disappointed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lickum · #2 03-29-2011, 10:10 AM

If the accusations are correct, what an asshole. This shouldnt be thrown to the wayside, a GM should strip it from him and suspend him to send a clear message it wont be tolerated.

Smyd · #3 03-29-2011, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lickum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the accusations are correct, what an asshole. This shouldnt be thrown to the wayside, a GM should strip it from him and suspend him to send a clear message it wont be tolerated.

Agreed. Teach him a lesson!

Chucck · #4 03-29-2011, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lickum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the accusations are correct, what an asshole. This shouldnt be thrown to the wayside, a GM should strip it from him and suspend him to send a clear message it wont be tolerated.

While I have absolutly nothing to do with this, this quote is ridiculous. While some people might find it wrong, which it might be, there is no reason for a GM to strip and suspend someone for looting in a group that he killed in. They are not our parents and need to govern every aspect of interaction, and there is not a rule to the server that states its always NbG, or done a specific way when it comes to looting. Each group can make their own rules. So to suspend someone would be crazy as he didnt break any actual rule.

Tiggles · #5 03-29-2011, 10:19 AM

Hey I can make up lies too when I lose the roll on loot

Screenshots or didn't happen

FearsEdge · #6 03-29-2011, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey I can make up lies too when I lose the roll on loot

Screenshots or didn't happen

You can make up lies too, and I could be lying, but I am not. I hope he has screenshots and posts them. Until then, you can believe me or not, but I am telling you what I saw.

FearsEdge · #7 03-29-2011, 10:18 AM

I argued with him for awhile until he logged off, he tried to say that since Goragu didnt random 100 right away (he jokingly randomed 100 100, which is obviously not a real roll, and he was joking because he thought he should get it in the first place, because no one else could use). When he actually DID random 100 a few minutes later when it became apparent that this guy had decided he wasn't giving it up because Goragu needed it, he won with a 99. I was watching. But he claimed he didn't actually win, since he didn't do it earlier.

Every time one of his ad hoc reasons for deciding who would get it(which again, he was only in the position to do because he ninja looted) was defeated he had another one.

I would like him to be here to defend himself, but he logged off when I kept repeating that Goragu, in fact, won the roll he shouldn't have had to roll in the first place.

Chucck · #8 03-29-2011, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FearsEdge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I argued with him for awhile until he logged off, he tried to say that since Goragu didnt random 100 right away (he jokingly randomed 100 100, which is obviously not a real roll, and he was joking because he thought he should get it in the first place, because no one else could use). When he actually DID random 100 a few minutes later when it became apparent that this guy had decided he wasn't giving it up because Goragu needed it, he won with a 99. I was watching. But he claimed he didn't actually win, since he didn't do it earlier.

Every time one of his ad hoc reasons for deciding who would get it(which again, he was only in the position to do because he ninja looted) was defeated he had another one.

I would like him to be here to defend himself, but he logged off when I kept repeating that Goragu, in fact, won the roll he shouldn't have had to roll in the first place.

Once again, that is your opinion on how loot should go. Need before greed as some people say. Doesn't mean that thats how it actually is unless agreed upon in a PUG ahead of time.

FearsEdge · #9 03-29-2011, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chucck [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Once again, that is your opinion on how loot should go. Need before greed as some people say. Doesn't mean that thats how it actually is unless agreed upon in a PUG ahead of time.

Goragu said that when he was there, it was a nbg group in practice, but no one actually explained explicitly how the loot was divided. I don't know, but I did see them random several times on things. He did in fact win the random roll, I know that much.

Gibcarver · #10 03-29-2011, 10:42 AM

We had been rolling on items for over an hour, with "does anyone need" being asked and FFA rolls if no one did. One example that stands out supporing that it was a NBG group was when the druid gloves dropped someone said to go ahead and roll because the druid already has them.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]