![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Once the wizard hits level 54 quadding becomes extremely efficient for the wizard, far more than the druid. 54 level wizard quad spell: Pillar of Lightning - Area Effect Magic Based Direct Damage (848 max per mob), cost is 344 mana. 49 level druid quad spell: Lightning Blast - Area Effect Magic Based Direct Damage (477 max per mob), cost is 234 mana. At 54 lvl, on my druid I was quadding with Lightning Blast, the last quad spell the druid gets. I enjoy druids, I have two druids. Obviously I like playing druids more than wizards, but pretending the druid does everything better than a wizard is disingenuous. I agree the druid would be the easier class to level up and grants more flexibility in gameplay but obviously some people enjoy the smaller niche the wizard fills or there would be no wizards. Maybe this guy is one of those people who'd enjoy a wizard more, who knows? GL OP on your decision! Both classes have their own charm. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://wiki.project1999.com/Fist_of_Karana
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Danth | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Wizards utilize a manastone more efficiently.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Eh, 200hp and 250hp heals @12secs don't compare to an 800hp rune @15secs. Also, if you have to kill VS or Xygoz to get it, the epic argument falls flat.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
~Urrsa -60 Ogre Shaman- ~Gream -60 Dark Elf Cleric- ~Greame -60 Halfling Druid- ~Oppa -41 Dark Elf Enchanter- | ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|