Monopolizing Scout in WW...

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by dslaybac [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The fact that the same person has gotten *numerous* turn ins versus many conpetitors is what brings up the question of whether or not he is using a third party program. I can take getting beat by different people each time... but the same guy every time? Fishy af. I mean what... is he the Michael Jordan of Scout Charisa turn in? He also accused me of using autofire the one time I beat him. Cheater assumes the only way to be beat is by another cheater? Or does he really think he's just that badass?

I think the only justification for this type of turn in is the assumed level playing field. That assumption fails when one person can consistently lock out others on a regular basis. Clearly everyone does not have a "fair and equal chance of succeeding." It certainly does raise questions about 3rd party programs. Even if that isn't the case, we have a situation in which a player is bottle-necking a quest they otherwise would have moved on from after a completion or so. I sincerely hope the server will come to an agreement on /random being the preferred way to settle Scout spawns in the future. There's no gaming the system in that rule set.

Originally Posted by dslaybac [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He also accused me of using autofire the one time I beat him. Cheater assumes the only way to be beat is by another cheater? Or does he really think he's just that badass?

This part in particular is funny because that's the exact same reaction Catherin, patron saint of autofire, had when she lost to legit players.
HOW COULD THEY BEAT ME? I'M CHEATING.