Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:08 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alawen Everywhere [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
...are we going to also see mage pets and enchanter charm modified back to reality?
You don't get it. If druids are nerfed back to classic and another class isn't, this is pareto better than if they just kept every class in its un-classic form, since the goal of this server is to be classic. You have some weird concept of fairness where one class can't get a significant (and classically accurate) nerf unless all other classes do. I guess they should just stop patching the server until they find something to nerf for each class.

In the meantime, why don't you actually say what needs to be nerfed about mage pets and Enchanter charm? Why don't you bug report it (with evidence) and actually contribute to the project, instead of whining about it?

As for everyone else, if you don't like the changes, you should probably see if they're accurate first. http://waybackmachine.org/*/http://www.everlore.com is a good place to start.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #2  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:41 PM
Bubbles Bubbles is offline
Fire Giant

Bubbles's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 965
Default

meh i'll give this its own topic and not fuss up the druid thread.
__________________
Bubbles HatesMelees, Cleric
Miley Vyrus, Necro
Hail Balls, Warrior

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Most of the people with bad experiences with me hang out in R&F, shocking, looks like I'm doing something right.
Last edited by Bubbles; 03-13-2011 at 01:52 PM..
  #3  
Old 03-13-2011, 03:00 PM
Alawen Everywhere Alawen Everywhere is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You don't get it. If druids are nerfed back to classic and another class isn't, this is pareto better than if they just kept every class in its un-classic form, since the goal of this server is to be classic. You have some weird concept of fairness where one class can't get a significant (and classically accurate) nerf unless all other classes do. I guess they should just stop patching the server until they find something to nerf for each class.

In the meantime, why don't you actually say what needs to be nerfed about mage pets and Enchanter charm? Why don't you bug report it (with evidence) and actually contribute to the project, instead of whining about it?

As for everyone else, if you don't like the changes, you should probably see if they're accurate first. http://waybackmachine.org/*/http://www.everlore.com is a good place to start.
I would say it's you who doesn't get it. Are druids taking down Brother Z or soloing every camp in LGuk? Are druids even the preferred powerlevelers?

The inaccuracies of druid dot stacking, damage shield duration and SoW/SoC stacking had very little impact on anyone except the lowbies begging for DS in EC tunnel.

Imbalances in the other classes have skewed the entire history of the server.

I have no idea why I'm responding to and I won't again. You're a fucking idiot.
  #4  
Old 03-13-2011, 03:40 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I said
In the meantime, why don't you actually say what needs to be nerfed about mage pets and Enchanter charm? Why don't you bug report it (with evidence) and actually contribute to the project, instead of whining about it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by To which you said
The inaccuracies of druid dot stacking, damage shield duration and SoW/SoC stacking had very little impact ... Imbalances in the other classes have skewed the entire history of the server.
What imbalances? Please actually respond instead of just recapitulating things you've already said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by I said
If druids are nerfed back to classic and another class isn't, this is pareto better than if they just kept every class in its un-classic form, since the goal of this server is to be classic. You have some weird concept of fairness where one class can't get a significant (and classically accurate) nerf unless all other classes do. I guess they should just stop patching the server until they find something to nerf for each class.
Quote:
Originally Posted by To which you said
(nothing)
I guess I understand why at the end of your post you committed to not responding to me again: you never had anything substantive to say in response to me in the first place, and further replies would just make it clearer how asinine this thread was.

Quote:
Originally Posted by You said
You're a fucking idiot.
You sure argue civilly for a 50 year old [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #5  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:22 PM
eriamjh eriamjh is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What imbalances? Please actually respond instead of just recapitulating things you've already said.
He is referring to Whirl till you Hurl like everyone else.

The story goes: It was nerfed 2 weeks (or whatever) into classic. Casting Tash + Whirl kept mobs chain stunned very very easily and it was really BS. Add single resist check, LONG duration root and there was barely any risk to the enchanter since even DDs-break-root didn't exist for awhile.

Basically two things happened when it got nerfed:

1. Instead of being "all or nothing" it gained a random duration like root! Now every time whirl did land it was for a random 0 to 12 seconds instead of the full 12 seconds. That straight up more than halved its effectiveness.

2. It became a mesmerize line spell in contrast to a stun line spell. This meant that if any melee hit the mob during those 0-12 seconds they broke the stun. Additionally a mobs attack would continue to refresh while stunned, allowing the mob to attack just as soon as the stun broke. This made it useless as a combat mez other than to keep the mob from beating the enchanter while they reevaluated or refreshed another spell.

So... Neither of these work here and enchanters are locking down mobs like Undertow and Estrella of Gloomwater with a much lower chance of failure.

Undertow normally kills a charmed seahorses guard taken from his spawn even with 60-70% haste and weapons to quad. With Whirl he rarely is able to cast Ice Commet as he literally spends most of the fight stunned while the pet DPSs.

I can't personally solo Estrella and so don't try. However I doubt she is supposed to be pleasant to kill at all either. (She is a 51 druid that starts out with a 29 DS and should cast Superior Healing at least as soon as the spell changes preceding Kunark.)

A certain enchanter who probably wont remain nameless for long spent months selling the shoulder items off of these mobs starting at around 35,000pp and 50,000pp respectively. This went on for several months and neither item dropped below 20,0000 pp in this time. That person alone obviously had the opportunity to make half a million platinum if not a full million or more off of this bug if not a few others, too. (Like mobs not pathing into LOS to cast and choosing to melee pitifully instead. Pathing in KK was JUST fixed patch before last.)

Sufficeth to say there is reason to be angry and frustrated.
  #6  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:30 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eriamjh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He is referring to Whirl till you Hurl like everyone else.

The story goes: It was nerfed 2 weeks (or whatever) into classic. Casting Tash + Whirl kept mobs chain stunned very very easily and it was really BS. Add single resist check, LONG duration root and there was barely any risk to the enchanter since even DDs-break-root didn't exist for awhile.

Basically two things happened when it got nerfed:

1. Instead of being "all or nothing" it gained a random duration like root! Now every time whirl did land it was for a random 0 to 12 seconds instead of the full 12 seconds. That straight up more than halved its effectiveness.

2. It became a mesmerize line spell in contrast to a stun line spell. This meant that if any melee hit the mob during those 0-12 seconds they broke the stun. Additionally a mobs attack would continue to refresh while stunned, allowing the mob to attack just as soon as the stun broke. This made it useless as a combat mez other than to keep the mob from beating the enchanter while they reevaluated or refreshed another spell.

So... Neither of these work here and enchanters are locking down mobs like Undertow and Estrella of Gloomwater with a much lower chance of failure.

Undertow normally kills a charmed seahorses guard taken from his spawn even with 60-70% haste and weapons to quad. With Whirl he rarely is able to cast Ice Commet as he literally spends most of the fight stunned while the pet DPSs.

I can't personally solo Estrella and so don't try. However I doubt she is supposed to be pleasant to kill at all either. (She is a 51 druid that starts out with a 29 DS and should cast Superior Healing at least as soon as the spell changes preceding Kunark.)

A certain enchanter who probably wont remain nameless for long spent months selling the shoulder items off of these mobs starting at around 35,000pp and 50,000pp respectively. This went on for several months and neither item dropped below 20,0000 pp in this time. That person alone obviously had the opportunity to make half a million platinum if not a full million or more off of this bug if not a few others, too. (Like mobs not pathing into LOS to cast and choosing to melee pitifully instead. Pathing in KK was JUST fixed patch before last.)

Sufficeth to say there is reason to be angry and frustrated.
Actually he said "Enchanter charm", so I don't think he was referring to Whirl - although I have no problem with Whirl getting nerfed (even though I have an enchanter). I think the silliness of this is that he claims that his class is unfairly nerfed, yet won't even bug report the nerfs he thinks should happen for mages/enchanters. By all means, try to get Whirl nerfed if you think it's classic - I just think that doing so with strong evidence and a good attitude in the Bugs forum is a lot more productive than what Alawen is doing. Basically, there's no reason it won't get changed if you can provide enough good evidence.

I also think Ravhin is totally right.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #7  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:58 PM
eriamjh eriamjh is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually he said "Enchanter charm", so I don't think he was referring to Whirl - although I have no problem with Whirl getting nerfed (even though I have an enchanter). I think the silliness of this is that he claims that his class is unfairly nerfed, yet won't even bug report the nerfs he thinks should happen for mages/enchanters. By all means, try to get Whirl nerfed if you think it's classic - I just think that doing so with strong evidence and a good attitude in the Bugs forum is a lot more productive than what Alawen is doing. Basically, there's no reason it won't get changed if you can provide enough good evidence.

I also think Ravhin is totally right.
So he did. Still. It's not like they didn't know since launch. At least I am pretty sure they did.. Lets make sure quick.

...

k done.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wenai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have been saying since prior to launch that it was a random duration. I never played an enchanter and never really grouped with one, but my point of reference is the Tranquil Staff.

[...]
Starting to see the fairness issue and why this is boiling over into Server Chat? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #8  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:30 PM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

In their defense, a lot of the devs in that thread aren't as active as they used to be (at least they don't seem to be). Additionally, (as you can see from the thread) they weren't clear on when it should be nerfed in the timeline and what the most appropriate fix would be. Nerfing druids was easy so that's probably why it was done sooner - it just meant changing some values, like "spell x has to have duration y instead of duration z". I'm glad you at least did the mature thing and bumped the thread. The only really productive thing you can do to get whirl changed, is to keep providing evidence and keep posting in that thread.

Basically, if something isn't changed for a while there's no reason it should spill into server chat or turn into some big protest. The devs don't have any sinister reason for keeping certain classes overpowered or for preferencing any class over another. There's almost always a reasonable explanation for why class X got nerfed and class Y didn't. Just try to understand this from their perspective.

I basically agree with what yaaaflow says at the end of his post. I don't think they should change things based on hunches and anecdotal evidence.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #9  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:34 PM
mcy mcy is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 120
Default

At least druids are useful in raids. I played a mage back in the day and it was a great class until I realized how utterly useless they were in raids. Promptly switched to a monk so at least I could pull for raids.

As far as the pets go the only decent pet was earth the rest died too fast but I've noticed a lot of people being able to use fire as a solo tank pet. I know for a fact thats not how it was before and it should be changed if they are going for a classic feel.
  #10  
Old 03-13-2011, 06:51 PM
JayDee JayDee is offline
Planar Protector

JayDee's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,680
Default

Mages are very useful on raids and druids are almost worthless

L2Play Everquest
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.