US Oligarchs Find Common Ground In Circumventing Law

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nature is lazy, adopting strategies that are good enough. Its selectivity is non-existent. It cares not how well something is done, only that it is done.

Nature is lazy? In what context are you referring? What are you comparing nature to in order to attribute laziness as a trait? Or are you speaking of the nature of man?

Is it NOT natures intent to bring forth life? Is it NOT natures purpose to survive? What is nature's role in selecting winners and losers? What would Darwin say?

At what point in the evolutionary process are "we" no longer apart of nature? If we all evolved from a single celled organism is man part of nature?

Is a Beaver that builds a dam Lazy? Is the act of building the dam even considered nature? If that beaver had the intellectual ability and physical aptitude to build a dam with cement would he chose to, and would that be considered natural?

If a man builds a dam why is it not considered natural? Is the man and beaver's purpose for building the dam much different?

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am only acknowledging the hideous amalgamation of divergent ambitions by which man's nature is defined. We are all mad.

I don't understand your point here? So because we have differing ambitions trying to unify people you construe as being hideous, because it is in opposition to man's natural state?

Stalin and the Russian Army had far different ambitions during WWII but found a reason to ally with the U.S. and England to survive.

I'm the 1st person to say "forced amalgamation" is hideous, but the attempt to persuade others to join your cause even if they have different ambitions can always enlighten a man's senses.

Anyways please clarify your position if I have missed the mark here.