We're sending troops to Europe

[Daywolf]

According to the MilitaryTimes we are about to send two combat brigades back into Europe, maybe one but most likely two. Part of which are mechs (which we previously removed). The armor is already there but waiting for operators now.

Meanwhile Kerry is headed to Russia (correction: he's there this moment), discuss some topics with Putin, but also about something undisclosed. he was going for four days, which is very long stay for his position, but just cut it down to two days, the other day.

They say they haven't decided where to put the troops, but imo it's just likely undisclosed to us as of yet. We've had paratroopers in eastern europe (such as Ukraine) the past year, and are at this moment training their officers for combat operations against Russia. Likely they are being introduced to Jade Helm (A.I. command software modeled on the current situation), and how to operate under a two front war is my speculation.

edit: links added.

[Pokesan]

hell yeah!!

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hell yeah!!
[/IMG]

They're preparing for 0bama's third term, that being Hillary. Running out of time for the world war and liberal-socialist domination of the entire world as the result. Did you get your FEMA camp guard card in the mail yet, Pok3$&?

FEMA camps or not, this is some pretty slanted shit going on. Libtards getting us ready for their big war. I'm expecting our coming election to be a total strip & flip, or attempt to.

[Daywolf]

More evidence we are headed to something. Posturing for a wat er war.
The Nuclear Arms Race is heating up 10m audio. Delivery system testing going on (yeah saw the trails). Low earth orbit technology development in full swing and again Russians shuttling missiles around on tracks (like the shell game). Reasons for Russian pullout of Syria and projected escalation in middle-east. US redeploying bomber fleet from Guam to Australia out of Chinese and NK striking distance, this adds a third anticipated front.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More evidence we are headed to something. Posturing for a wat er war.
The Nuclear Arms Race is heating up 10m audio. Delivery system testing going on (yeah saw the trails). Low earth orbit technology development in full swing and again Russians shuttling missiles around on tracks (like the shell game). Reasons for Russian pullout of Syria and projected escalation in middle-east. US redeploying bomber fleet from Guam to Australia out of Chinese and NK striking distance, this adds a third anticipated front.

Russia had limited objectives in deploying to Syria. Their goal was not to go in and delve into a nation-building operation.

Their objective was to tip the balance of the combat operation back towards Bashar Assad with their additional combat power.

What Vladimir Putin has just done is let President Barack Obama know he was just defeated in a place where he supposedly drew a red line and declared “Assad must go.”

You are reading too much into this.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pew pew pew.[/IMG]

You don't know what mechanized means? odd... and I mentioned "armor" as well, which often refers to tanks. I'd say tank battalions, but I don't think we have those any longer. It's all combined arms now, more like mechanized infantry battalions etc.

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Russia had limited objectives in deploying to Syria. Their goal was not to go in and delve into a nation-building operation.

Their objective was to tip the balance of the combat operation back towards Bashar Assad with their additional combat power.

What Vladimir Putin has just done is let President Barack Obama know he was just defeated in a place where he supposedly drew a red line and declared “Assad must go.”

You are reading too much into this.

Iya don't think I mentioned Bush and nation building. Funny, but I never voted for the guy, though I did vote for H.

Anyway follow the money. It's probably more accurate to say Russia was doing arms trading showcasing. Just like as Mr. Castle mentioned, they made an arms deal with Iran.

In fact Iran was there, likely receiving battlefield hands-on training on how to use the new weapons they are receiving. This all made possible thanks to dems and reps working together! This is one of the reasons I liked Rand Paul so much, one of the few that stood up against the Iranian nuclear deal, which as a result of it's passage they are now able to be armed to the teeth.

Paul's points: “1) sanctions relief precedes evidence of compliance, 2) Iran is left with significant nuclear capacity, 3) it lifts the ban on selling advanced weapons to Iran.”

And as Mr. Castle mentioned, this will drive the Saudi's to arm as well, and everyone else. But I'm sure still again follow the money and we're already there to take care of that $illy $tuff.

It's undeniable though, our stance is changing to war ready. Not just preparedness, more than that, globally.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You don't know what mechanized means? odd... and I mentioned "armor" as well, which often refers to tanks. I'd say tank battalions, but I don't think we have those any longer. It's all combined arms now, more like mechanized infantry battalions etc.

Iya don't think I mentioned Bush and nation building. Funny, but I never voted for the guy, though I did vote for H.

Anyway follow the money. It's probably more accurate to say Russia was doing arms trading showcasing. Just like as Mr. Castle mentioned, they made an arms deal with Iran.

In fact Iran was there, likely receiving battlefield hands-on training on how to use the new weapons they are receiving. This all made possible thanks to dems and reps working together! This is one of the reasons I liked Rand Paul so much, one of the few that stood up against the Iranian nuclear deal, which as a result of it's passage they are now able to be armed to the teeth.

Paul's points: “1) sanctions relief precedes evidence of compliance, 2) Iran is left with significant nuclear capacity, 3) it lifts the ban on selling advanced weapons to Iran.”

And as Mr. Castle mentioned, this will drive the Saudi's to arm as well, and everyone else. But I'm sure still again follow the money and we're already there to take care of that $illy $tuff.

It's undeniable though, our stance is changing to war ready. Not just preparedness, more than that, globally.

Woah cool your jets I didn't put words in your mouth. I was saying that generally people presume that nation-building is how war is waged because America has engaged in nation-building warfare since the 1940's.

Russia is not bound to any vanity or humanitarian agendas and this might be news to people. Their goal was not to build Syria up, rather just flip the bird to Obama and his redline for Assad.

"The Syrian people must decide Assad's fate." - Vladimir Putin

Cements my point even further. Russia "pulling" out has nothing to do with any global war agenda by the USA or USA pressure. Russia fucked Obama in the ass in Syria so to speak by destroying anti-Assad terrorist groups.

Obama wanted to install another terror government into a former peaceful Middle East nation (Egypt, Libya, Tangiers) but Putin said "no thank you sir, not near my country. Go play in your own backyard and create terrorist group governments there, were going to tip the balance back to neutral and give Assad a fair shake" so to speak.

Most posters on these forums are fed cow-shit sponsored and funded by the NDAA bill. That much is obvious. Assad is a moderate.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cements my point even further. Russia "pulling" out has nothing to do with any global war agenda by the USA or USA pressure. Russia fucked Obama in the ass in Syria so to speak by destroying anti-Assad terrorist groups.

It may seem like that on the surface right now with all what is being said for in part for propaganda interests, but the fact is Russia has had a long history with it's interest in Syria long before the recent events unfolded.

That's Russia's major port of the region, their primary footing in the middle-east, especially regarding logistics. They have been working with the Syrian government for a very long time, and their interests became endangered with the rise of the arab spring. Part of which I believe the 0bama administration supported for the purpose of detaching Russia further from the region. Russia had no choice but to respond, like a hook shoved into their mouth, or risk losing a valuable logistical asset. Disclaimer: I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but just that it is what it is.

Some have speculated, some time back, that Russia made a deal within the region, for support when needed, as a deal that would turn away a Muslim cultural invasion of Russia as seems to be happening in the West now. These are not simple alliances and disputes, there is a lot more happening here than just a pissing contest with an incompetent US president.

[Cecily]

All I got out of this is that we're sending mech warriors to Europe.

[Knuckle]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I got out of this is that we're sending mech warriors to Europe.

what set you free? what brought you to me babe?