Conservative Justice Antonius Scalia Dies; Conservatives Will Try To Obstruct

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ket [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You must be joking. Right? Is this cracked p99 humor?

-Ket

Mercury (thimerosal 50% mercury) was never removed, only the wording was altered to conceal it. It's used as a preservative, and in every vaccine. They just smudged the numbers so to claim it's mercury free on packaging, but still really isn't. Government bureaucracy at work. This is nothing new out of the FDA, they have a history of deceit. This is admittedly so btw, not a hidden thing, just you never looked into it which is what they count on. Consider yourself the average American. Big gobernment really isn't here to protect you though, it's about power, money and a narrow ideology they are trying to foster.

Originally Posted by nyclin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You must have come here expecting serious discussion. This is just the forum where trolls pad their post counts, since they can't in RnF.

Yeah, I'm sure to some, insulting the federal government bureaucracy by using truth is a form of trolling here. The feds could never ever ever do anything wrong... [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This whole thing is utterly retarded. The language of the constitution is very simple. The constitution outlines a collaborative process for appointing justices to the SCOTUS.

"he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

The Executive branch is subordinate to the Legislature in this situation.

Should the President nominate justices? Yes.

Should the Senate evaluate them? Yes.

Unfortunately the role of the SCOTUS has been perverted. It now exists as a means of subverting the power of the Legislature.

The simple fact that we openly recognize Justices as liberal/conservative is testament of the corruption.

If the court, the justices and judges of lower courts actually did their fucking jobs and interpreted law in a non-partisan fashion there wouldn't be an issue.

You have obviously never read the SCOTUS ruling on Marbury v. Madison.

[Ket]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mercury (thimerosal 50% mercury) was never removed, only the wording was altered to conceal it. It's used as a preservative, and in every vaccine. They just smudged the numbers so to claim it's mercury free on packaging, but still really isn't. Government bureaucracy at work. This is nothing new out of the FDA, they have a history of deceit. This is admittedly so btw, not a hidden thing, just you never looked into it which is what they count on. Consider yourself the average American. Big gobernment really isn't here to protect you though, it's about power, money and a narrow ideology they are trying to foster.:

Incorrect. The primary difference between methyl and ethyl mercury is that they are both chemically structured differently.


CH³ - Hg+X¯
CH³ - CH² - Hg+X¯

(Having trouble populating symbols in this thing. Weird)

The top belongs to methyl-mercury and the bottom to ethyl-mercury.

Methylmercury is found in natural environments and has been known to bioaccumulate (gradually gather into higher and higher amounts in an organic body), causing nervous damage in mammals. You can find higher amounts of this compound in marine life (i.e. fishes and dolphins) than in any vaccines you'll come across within your lifetime.

Ethyl-mercury, unlike methyl, is formed when the body breaks down thimerosal, an organic mercury compound used as a preservative in vaccines. Since ethyl has a shorter half-life than methyl, it can easily break down and be flushed out from the body because of its structure.

However, the fears that somehow any amount of mercury (be it thimerosal or any of the two aforementioned compounds) is linked to autism is rooted in the controversial decision by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to remove thimerosal from vaccines for solely preventive measures. While many saw this is a link between vaccines and autism, ultimately there have been many more research studies proven to show no such link between the two.

Still, the damage has been done and the idea that mercury in general causes autism and a number of other imagine maladies still generates throughout many (uneducated) social circles today.

Educate yoself.

-Ket

[Daywolf]

http://vaxtruth.org/2014/09/dr-oz-flu-shots/

[Ket]

Clicked it. Saw "Dr Oz". Closed and lol'd.

-Ket

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have obviously never read the SCOTUS ruling on Marbury v. Madison.

Obviously. On an equally germane note, your sig is broken.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ket [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Clicked it. Saw "Dr Oz". Closed and lol'd.

-Ket

Oh you're a funny guy. So you believe everythin a TV doc tells you then? The dude lays it out well with resource links why Oz is wrong. Well you can lead a horse to water...
Have fun shooting that shit into you, and having others forced into it.

[Ket]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh you're a funny guy. So you believe everythin a TV doc tells you then? The dude lays it out well with resource links why Oz is wrong. Well you can lead a horse to water...
Have fun shooting that shit into you, and having others forced into it.

Actually, no. Since I didn't read, I didn't get the meat of the message. As your argument is on the toxicity of the mercury in vaccines, and as you presented a link for your claims, and as that link specifically mentions Dr. Oz, I incorrectly assumed it was a link of Dr. Oz defending your claims. Given the chain of events I don't think that was too illogical a leap to make.

Dr. Oz is a joke. So much so that I refuse to read anything remotely connected to him, whether it refutes or affirms my position. If you'd like, we can present peer reviewed articles defending our respective positions.

-Ket

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ket [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually, no. Since I didn't read, I didn't get the meat of the message. As your argument is on the toxicity of the mercury in vaccines, and as you presented a link for your claims, and as that link specifically mentions Dr. Oz, I incorrectly assumed it was a link of Dr. Oz defending your claims. Given the chain of events I don't think that was too illogical a leap to make.

Dr. Oz is a joke. So much so that I refuse to read anything remotely connected to him, whether it refutes or affirms my position. If you'd like, we can present peer reviewed articles defending our respective positions.

-Ket

l2troll better.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Ket [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dr. Oz is a joke. So much so that I refuse to read anything remotely connected to him, whether it refutes or affirms my position. If you'd like, we can present peer reviewed articles defending our respective positions.

-Ket

Yeah fuck skepticism and critical thought. We all have our own ideas and are entitled to be right so long as we agree not to call out others on their bullshit.

Keep your facts to yourself Daywolf and out of my safe space.