Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2016, 04:19 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

What's straight forward about being awarded DKP but not being allowed to spend it?
  #2  
Old 02-06-2016, 04:34 PM
Morgander Morgander is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What's straight forward about being awarded DKP but not being allowed to spend it?
I cannot speak for the minors here, but as adults, it is our responsibility to ensure that we have read, understood, and accepted the rules for the organizations of which we apply ourselves to. This rule is clear as day, outlined in a permanent policy page located in an easy to find location on our forums under the heading, "Loot Policy". Failure to read or accept these policies are not the responsibility of anyone but those individuals with which are making decisions for themselves.

Anyone who does not like a policy is open to discuss said policy openly with officers. This does not guarantee the change or removal of said policy, but at the end of the day, individuals that reject said policies, should not have applied for membership, or should have respectfully withdrawn said application.

There's nothing wrong with that.
  #3  
Old 02-06-2016, 05:22 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What's straight forward about being awarded DKP but not being allowed to spend it?
Lol, this ass hat had 11% life time attendance, ~90 raids out of 900 and he thinks he deserves something for it? His 30 day raid attendance was 0%. Perhaps he should attend a raid if he wants to spend dkp at them.
  #4  
Old 02-06-2016, 05:25 PM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
~90 raids out of 900 and he thinks he deserves something for it?
I think I deserve to be able to talk about the harassment, TMO officers coming back, loot council changes, and all the other drama without being kicked and given no reason.

Well anyway, there it is. Forsaken expects you to attend 90 raids and get nothing for it. A solid 3+ days of playing EQ for the guild and then kicked for discussing things unrelated to loot.
  #5  
Old 02-06-2016, 06:04 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azxten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think I deserve to be able to talk about the harassment, TMO officers coming back, loot council changes, and all the other drama without being kicked and given no reason.

Well anyway, there it is. Forsaken expects you to attend 90 raids and get nothing for it. A solid 3+ days of playing EQ for the guild and then kicked for discussing things unrelated to loot.
90 raids in over how many months? and be truthful, looking it up isn't hard. And to be fair 90 was actually more than the site says.

As for former TMO people, apparently you weren't actually paying attention to that guild meeting last night after all.

FAT is better off without a ghosting wizard imo
  #6  
Old 02-06-2016, 06:11 PM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
90 raids in over how many months? and be truthful, looking it up isn't hard. And to be fair 90 was actually more than the site says.

As for former TMO people, apparently you weren't actually paying attention to that guild meeting last night after all.

FAT is better off without a ghosting wizard imo
The image is right up there of the roster showing 91, so you're just lying more with direct proof a couple comments up. My name is still on the roster and its marked with a little red dot bro.

Keep clinging to that ghosting angle even though you can likely still see my post in the AFK thread if they didn't already delete it.
  #7  
Old 02-06-2016, 06:15 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azxten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The image is right up there of the roster showing 91, so you're just lying more with direct proof a couple comments up. My name is still on the roster and its marked with a little red dot bro.

Keep clinging to that ghosting angle even though you can likely still see my post in the AFK thread if they didn't already delete it.
I misread the lifetime total, but keep being proud of your 91 raids out of 890, that alone is enough reason for a raiding guild to kick you and not give you loot. Posting that you are going afk in the forum doesn't somehow put your attendance on hold. It just means you wont be kicked for not being there. When you came back instead of working to get your attendance up you bitched about not being able to spend your dkp. We have the raid attendance requirements to specifically keep loot going to people who ghost, like you.

your 60 day was 7% your 30day was 0% and you think you deserve the right to bid on loot? Lets ignore the fact that your first raid was on 6/19/15 which means you were in the guild for 8 months, in which time you couldn't achieve more than 11% lifetime attendance?

you're dismissed kid
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.